Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A

Y-DNA Haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A is a very recent, highly derived branch within the broader I2 paternal lineage, one of the classic European hunter-gatherer-associated Y-chromosome clades. Because it sits deep within a long chain of nested subclades, its age is expected to be much younger than the parent haplogroups, most plausibly arising in southeastern Europe during the late Neolithic or Copper Age.

The lineage likely reflects a combination of regional continuity from earlier I2-bearing populations and subsequent microfounder events in small communities. In phylogeographic terms, such a deeply derived and rare clade often expands not because of continent-wide demographic replacement, but through localized descent from one or a few successful paternal lines.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch of I2A1A1A1A1B2B2, this lineage is best understood as part of a fine-scale phylogenetic structure rather than a broad macro-historical expansion. Its immediate parent clade indicates an ancestry tied to the wider I2 network, which has produced multiple regional lineages across Europe. Because of its rarity, publicly documented downstream diversity may be limited, and additional samples could reveal further internal branching.

Geographical Distribution

Current occurrences are expected to be scattered and low-frequency, with the strongest likelihood in Balkan and adjacent southeastern European populations, followed by sporadic detections elsewhere in Europe. The distribution pattern is consistent with an old regional lineage that persisted through repeated population shifts, including Neolithic farmer expansions, Bronze Age mobility, and later historical migrations.

It may also appear in Central, Northern, and Eastern Europe at very low levels due to drift, historical admixture, and the movement of individuals in the medieval and modern periods. Occasional presence in diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia is most likely a consequence of recent migration rather than ancient local origin in those regions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Haplogroups within I2 are often associated with prehistoric European populations, especially Mesolithic and post-Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, though many derived branches persisted into farming and metal-age societies. For a rare derived subclade such as I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A, direct association with a single archaeological culture is usually uncertain; however, its origin plausibly overlaps with the cultural transitions of late Neolithic southeastern Europe.

Potentially relevant contexts include the Balkan Copper Age, regional Neolithic-to-Chalcolithic continuity, and later demographic layers of the Bronze Age that redistributed paternal lines across Europe. Because this lineage is so rare, its historical signal is best interpreted as a marker of localized paternal descent rather than a hallmark of a large, expansionist prehistoric population.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A represents a highly specific and rare branch of the European paternal tree. Its most likely history combines deep European ancestry, southeastern European emergence, and long-term survival through founder effects and drift, making it an informative but elusive marker of fine-scale population history.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A Aktuell ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 I2A1A1A1A1B2B2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 I2A1A1A1A1B2B ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 I2A1A1A1A1B2 ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,500 Jahre 1 0 0
5 I2A1A1A1A1B ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 1 7 0
6 I2A1A1A1A1 ~8,000 years ago Neolithic 8,000 Jahre 2 62 0
7 I2A1A1A1A ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 2 91 2
8 I2A1A1A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 104 0
9 I2A1A1A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 210 0
10 I2A1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 240 0
11 I2A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 720 39
12 I2A1 ~16,000 years ago Mesolithic 16,000 Jahre 2 933 0
13 I2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 1,551 24
14 I2 ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 1,785 10
15 I ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 4 3,486 79

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Southeastern Europe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A is found include:

  1. Balkan populations
  2. East Slavic populations
  3. Central European populations
  4. Scandinavian populations
  5. German and Austrian populations
  6. British and Irish populations
  7. Baltic populations
  8. Recent diaspora populations in the Americas and Australia

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Europe (Balkans) High
Central Europe (adjacent to Balkans) Moderate
Adriatic / Mediterranean coast Moderate
Western Europe Low
Northern Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
Southeastern Europe Low
North America Low
Australia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~6k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu I2A1A1A1A1B2B2A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

890 British Late Iron Age French Chalcolithic French Neolithic Phoenician Portugal_N Portuguese Chalcolithic Proto-Nuragic Remedello Southwest Iberian Tunisia_Punic-oAfrica
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.