Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O1A1A1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup O1A1A1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O1A1A1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O1A1A1B is a derived subclade of O1A1A1, itself part of the broader O-M119/O1a paternal lineage. This branch belongs to a major East Asian Y-chromosome radiation that is strongly associated with demographic expansions in southern China, coastal East Asia, and Southeast Asia. Because O1a subclades are especially common among populations linked to Austronesian, Tai-Kadai, Austroasiatic, and southern Sinitic contexts, O1A1A1B is best understood as a lineage that likely formed during the late Paleolithic to early Neolithic transition, followed by later regional spread.

The most reasonable time depth for this subclade is roughly 12 kya, although the exact age depends on future phylogenetic resolution and sampling density. As with many downstream branches of O-M119, its history probably reflects a combination of local lineage differentiation, coastal and riverine dispersal, and population expansion associated with early farming communities in East Asia.

Subclades

Publicly available phylogenetic resolution for O1A1A1B may be limited compared with broader O-M119 branches, but its placement implies that it is one step below O1A1A1 and therefore part of a cluster of lineages that diversified within eastern Eurasia. In practical population-genetic terms, it is a nested regional lineage whose distribution is expected to overlap with other O1a descendants rather than form a highly isolated global branch.

Geographical Distribution

This lineage is expected to occur at low to moderate frequencies in populations of East Asia and Southeast Asia, especially in areas with historical continuity of southern East Asian ancestry. Likely concentrations include:

  • Southern China and adjacent mainland East Asian populations
  • Taiwanese Austronesian-speaking groups
  • Island Southeast Asia, especially populations with Austronesian ancestry
  • Mainland Southeast Asia, including Thai, Vietnamese, and related groups
  • Korean and Japanese populations at lower frequencies through East Asian gene flow
  • Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in parts of southern China and the Himalayan periphery

Because O-M119 is particularly associated with southern and coastal East Asian paternal history, O1A1A1B should be interpreted as part of that broader distribution rather than as a marker of a single ethnicity.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader O-M119/O1a clade is often discussed in relation to early agricultural expansions in East Asia and, for some descendant branches, the dispersals of Austronesian-speaking populations from Taiwan into Island Southeast Asia and the wider Pacific. While O1A1A1B itself cannot be assigned to a single archaeological culture with confidence, its ancestry is compatible with the demographic processes that shaped Neolithic coastal societies, early rice-farming communities, and later maritime dispersals.

In historical population genetics, lineages in this part of the Y-chromosome tree are important because they help distinguish southern East Asian paternal ancestry from northern steppe-associated lineages such as C, N, Q, R, and illustrate the deep structure of male-line variation within East Asia.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup O1A1A1B is a relatively specific East Asian paternal subclade nested within the broader O-M119 radiation. Its likely origin in East Asia and subsequent spread across southern East Asia and related coastal regions make it an informative marker of ancient population structure, Neolithic demographic expansion, and later regional mobility.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O1A1A1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O1A1A1B Aktuell ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 7 0
2 O1A1A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 29 0
3 O1A1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 1 37 0
4 O1A1 ~30,000 years ago Paleolithic 30,000 Jahre 1 37 0
5 O1A ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 3 57 20
6 O1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 132 8
7 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
8 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O1A1A1B is found include:

  1. Southern Chinese populations
  2. Han Chinese and other East Asian populations
  3. Vietnamese and other mainland Southeast Asian populations
  4. Thai and related Tai-Kadai-speaking populations
  5. Austronesian-speaking populations, especially in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  6. Korean and Japanese populations at lower frequencies
  7. Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in southern China and the Himalayas

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia (Island) High
Eastern Asia (Southern China / Taiwan) Moderate
Oceania / Pacific Islands Low
Northeast Asia (Ryukyus / Southern Japan) Low
South Asia (coastal occurrences) Low
Southeast Asia Moderate
Southern China High
Island Southeast Asia and nearby Oceania Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~12k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O1A1A1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O1A1A1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O1A1A1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Ancient Tonga Chinese Island Southeast Asian Culture Taiwanese Iron
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.