Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O1B1A1A1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup O1B1A1A1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O1B1A1A1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O1B1A1A1B is a subclade of O1B1A1A1, itself part of the broader O-M268 paternal lineage. As a downstream branch in the East Asian Y-chromosome tree, it most likely arose during the late Holocene, when male lineages in southern East Asia were diversifying rapidly under the influence of demographic growth, local founder effects, and population movement.

Because this haplogroup is nested within a lineage that is strongly represented in southern China and mainland Southeast Asia, its origin is best understood in the context of the broader regional expansion of East Asian populations rather than as an isolated event. The estimated time depth is consistent with a lineage that emerged after the initial post-glacial population reorganization, likely around the time early agricultural societies were forming and dispersing.

Subclades

As an intermediate-to-terminal subclade, O1B1A1A1B represents a more specific branch within a larger phylogenetic cluster. In most available Y-DNA phylogenies, such lineages are used to track finer-scale paternal ancestry and can help distinguish population structure within East and Southeast Asia.

Known or closely related downstream branches are expected to be relatively rare outside the core range of the parent clade. The exact internal branching pattern may vary depending on the reference tree and the resolution of sequencing data, but the haplogroup is clearly part of a derived East Asian paternal radiation.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be found at low to moderate frequency in populations across southern China and mainland Southeast Asia, with additional occurrences in neighboring East Asian populations. Its distribution likely reflects historical gene flow among populations speaking or adopting Sinitic, Tai-Kadai, Austroasiatic, and Austronesian languages, as well as local demographic history shaped by migration, assimilation, and drift.

Typical regions where related lineages occur include:

  • Southern China, especially Han Chinese and regional minority populations
  • Vietnam and nearby mainland Southeast Asian groups
  • Parts of Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia through Austronesian-associated dispersals
  • Smaller signals in Korea and Japan due to regional admixture or shared East Asian ancestry

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader paternal background of O-M268 and its descendant branches is often discussed in relation to the spread of agricultural societies in East Asia, especially those associated with rice-based economies and expanding Neolithic-to-Bronze Age populations. While no single archaeology-to-haplogroup assignment can be made with certainty, lineages in this neighborhood of the Y-chromosome tree are frequently linked to demographic expansions that shaped the genetic landscape of southern China and Southeast Asia.

For genealogical studies, this haplogroup can be informative for reconstructing paternal connections among East and Southeast Asian populations at a finer scale than more ancient or more broadly distributed O-clades. Its presence in multiple linguistic and geographic contexts suggests that it may have been carried by populations involved in repeated cycles of migration, assimilation, and language shift.

Conclusion

O1B1A1A1B is a derived East Asian Y-DNA lineage with probable roots in Holocene southern East Asia. Its distribution pattern is most consistent with a paternal branch shaped by prehistoric population growth, regional dispersals, and the long-term interaction of farming expansions and language spread across East and Southeast Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O1B1A1A1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O1B1A1A1B Aktuell ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 15 0
2 O1B1A1A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 2 33 0
3 O1B1A1A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 41 0
4 O1B1A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 55 0
5 O1B1A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 59 1
6 O1B1 ~25,000 years ago Paleolithic 25,000 Jahre 1 59 0
7 O1B ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 75 0
8 O1 ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 132 8
9 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
10 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O1B1A1A1B is found include:

  1. Southern Han Chinese and related populations
  2. Vietnamese and other mainland Southeast Asian populations
  3. Tai-Kadai-speaking populations
  4. Austroasiatic-speaking populations
  5. Austronesian-speaking populations in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  6. Some Korean populations
  7. Some Japanese populations
  8. Selected Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia (island and coastal) High
Eastern Asia (Taiwan, Fujian, Ryukyu) Moderate
Island Melanesia Low
South Asia (coastal) Low
Central Asia (coastal/contact zones) Low
Southeast Asia Moderate
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O1B1A1A1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O1B1A1A1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O1B1A1A1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Balong Culture China_EBA China_EIA China_IA_Hellenistic Indeterminate Laotian Malaysian Neolithic Qinchang Culture Roopkund C Group Thai Iron Age Transitional Indonesian Vietnamese Neolithic
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.