Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

O2A1B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup O2A1B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig O2A1B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1 is a subclade of O2A1B, itself part of the large O2 paternal lineage that is strongly associated with East Asian population history. Based on its phylogenetic position, O2A1B1 likely arose in East Asia during the early Holocene, after the Last Glacial Maximum, when human populations expanded and differentiated across northern and southern East Asia.

Because this lineage sits below O2A1B, it probably reflects a more localized and later branching event than its parent haplogroup. While precise age estimates vary by sampling strategy and phylogenetic resolution, a reasonable estimate for the emergence of O2A1B1 is around 10 kya, placing its origin in the early Neolithic or late pre-Neolithic transition period in East Asia.

Subclades

As an intermediate and downstream lineage, O2A1B1 may include additional unnamed or regionally concentrated branches in current phylogenies, depending on the study and SNP coverage. In many Y-DNA trees, deeper O2 lineages show strong structure linked to southern China, mainland Southeast Asia, and adjacent East Asian populations, with some branches expanding dramatically during later prehistoric and historic population growth.

Geographical Distribution

O2A1B1 is expected to be found primarily in East Asian populations, especially in Han Chinese and other populations of southern and central China. Given the broad distribution of its parent clade O2A1B, this subclade may also appear in Korean, Japanese, Tibeto-Burman, and Southeast Asian populations, particularly where historical migration and interregional contact have introduced East Asian paternal ancestry.

The lineage is likely to show the strongest frequencies in areas with long-term demographic continuity and large population expansions, including southern China and neighboring mainland Southeast Asia. It may also occur at lower frequencies in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia through Austronesian-mediated dispersals and later admixture.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The broader O2 phylogeny is often linked to the spread of agricultural societies, regional population expansions, and language-family dispersals in East Asia. For O2A1B1, the main historical significance lies in its value as a marker of post-glacial and Neolithic-era paternal diversification rather than any one single archaeological culture.

This haplogroup likely participated in the complex demographic history associated with the rise of Neolithic farming communities in China, subsequent population movements into Southeast Asia, and later expansions during the Bronze Age and historical periods. It may therefore be informative for studies of Han ethnogenesis, southern Chinese population structure, and the paternal ancestry of some Austroasiatic and Austronesian-speaking groups.

Regional Patterning and Interpretation

Compared with very deep O2 branches, O2A1B1 would be expected to show a strongly East and Southeast Asian distribution, with most lineages concentrated in populations that experienced long-term continuity in East Asia. In phylogeographic terms, this makes it a useful marker for tracing regional founder effects, neolithic demographic growth, and later social expansions in East Asia.

Because Y-DNA phylogenies are continually refined, the precise placement and geographic signal of O2A1B1 can change as new samples are added. Nonetheless, its position within O2A1B strongly supports an origin in East Asia and a subsequent history tied to the major population dynamics of eastern Eurasia.

Conclusion

Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1 is a relatively downstream East Asian paternal lineage that likely originated in the early Holocene and spread through the demographic expansion of East Asian populations. Its distribution is best interpreted in the context of Neolithic growth, regional population structure, and later migrations across China, Korea, Japan, and Southeast Asia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Regional Patterning and Interpretation
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis O2A1B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 O2A1B1 Aktuell ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 27 0
2 O2A1B ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 27 0
3 O2A1 ~15,000 years ago Mesolithic 15,000 Jahre 2 34 0
4 O2A ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 381 12
5 O2 ~35,000 years ago Paleolithic 35,000 Jahre 2 388 12
6 O ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 2 553 6
7 NO ~45,000 years ago Paleolithic 45,000 Jahre 4 801 12
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup O2A1B1 is found include:

  1. Han Chinese and other East Asian populations
  2. Southern Chinese and adjacent mainland Southeast Asian populations
  3. Southeast Asian populations, including Thai, Vietnamese, and Austroasiatic-speaking groups
  4. Austronesian-speaking populations, especially in Taiwan and Island Southeast Asia
  5. Korean and Japanese populations
  6. Tibeto-Burman-speaking populations in East Asia and the Himalayas

Regionale Präsenz

Southeast Asia High
Eastern Asia (southern China) Moderate
South Asia (India, Munda groups) Low
Island Southeast Asia & Near Oceania Low
Northeast Asia (Japan) Low
East Asia High
Southeast Asia Moderate
Central Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe O2A1B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig O2A1B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu O2A1B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Chinese Vietnamese Neolithic West Liao River Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.