Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 is a very specific downstream branch within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits deep in the R1a tree, its history is best understood as part of the wider expansion of R1a-associated male lineages across Eurasia, followed by later regional diversification and likely founder effects.

The parent lineage context suggests an origin in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian Steppe around 3 thousand years ago, although the precise emergence of this particular subclade may be somewhat younger or older depending on the branch-defining mutation and sampling coverage. As with many rare R1a subclades, its present-day distribution is probably shaped less by a single large prehistoric migration and more by the survival and expansion of a small number of male lines in local populations.

Subclades

As an intermediate and highly derived branch, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 helps connect its parent haplogroup to even more specialized descendant lines. In phylogenetic terms, it belongs to the complex internal structure of R1a, which includes many geographically distinct clades associated with Steppe Bronze Age, Eastern European, Central Asian, and South Asian population histories.

Because this lineage is rare, its internal substructure may be poorly sampled in public datasets. Future high-resolution Y-chromosome sequencing could reveal additional downstream branches and improve estimates of its age and dispersal history.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be found at low frequencies across a broad but uneven geographic range. The strongest signal is likely in Eastern Europe, especially among populations with substantial R1a ancestry, but it may also appear in Baltic, Scandinavian, Central Asian, Iranic, and Indo-Aryan populations.

Its scattered distribution is consistent with the wider history of R1a: an early association with steppe-derived male expansions, followed by later demographic sorting, drift, and local founder events. In many populations, only a small number of men may carry this exact subclade even where R1a overall is common.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although no single archaeological culture can be assigned to this exact subclade with certainty, it is broadly compatible with the post-Bronze Age world in which R1a lineages diversified. The broader R1a clade has often been discussed in relation to Corded Ware, Sintashta, Andronovo, and other steppe-related horizons, while later branching and persistence are compatible with the spread of Indo-European-speaking populations across Europe and Asia.

For this specific branch, the most plausible historical explanation is local male-line continuity within populations already carrying R1a, rather than a major standalone migration event. Such lineages are often informative for tracing clan formation, regional demography, and the deep paternal ancestry of present-day communities.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 is a rare and highly derived Y-DNA lineage within the broad R1a family. Its likely origin in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian Steppe and its patchy distribution across Eurasia point to a history shaped by steppe-era expansions, later regional diversification, and founder effects.

Notes on Interpretation

Because this is a deeply nested subclade, available evidence is usually indirect and based on the known phylogeography of R1a rather than large dedicated studies of this exact branch. As more full Y-chromosome sequences are published, the estimated age, origin location, and downstream branching of this haplogroup may be refined.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 158 3
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 336 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 359 4
7 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 445 0
8 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
9 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
10 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
11 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
12 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
13 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
14 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
South Asia (rare) Low
Caucasus / Near East (rare) Low
Western Europe Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
West Asia Low
Northern Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Estonian Bronze Age Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Ingrian Iron Age Culture Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.