Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a3a2a1b1a1b is a highly derived subclade within the western Eurasian R1b phylogeny. Because it sits deep inside a long chain of downstream branches, it is best interpreted as a rare founder lineage that arose after the major differentiation of R1b lineages associated with the post-glacial and early Holocene expansion of paternal lineages across West Eurasia.

The available phylogenetic context suggests an origin in West Eurasia around 10 thousand years ago (kya), though the exact emergence time of this specific terminal branch is uncertain and could be somewhat more recent. Unlike the well-known large R1b expansions linked to Bronze Age demographic events, this lineage likely survived as a localized, low-frequency branch shaped by drift, isolation, and occasional regional continuity.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal downstream branch in a rare lineage, R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a3a2a1b1a1b is expected to have few or no widely recognized subclades in current public phylogenies. In practice, lineages at this depth often appear as isolated samples or very small clusters, which limits inference about internal branching structure.

Within the broader R1b tree, it belongs to the same western Eurasian paternal macrolineage that includes many major European and Near Eastern branches. However, this particular clade does not appear to have been a major source of broad population replacement; instead, it likely reflects microregional persistence and inheritance within small populations over long periods.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be very rare and scattered across West Eurasia. Based on its placement in the tree and the parent lineage context, it may be found sporadically in:

  • Atlantic Europe, including the British Isles, Ireland, France, Iberia, and the Low Countries
  • Southern Europe, including Italy and the Balkans
  • West Asia, including Anatolia and the Caucasus
  • The Levant and North Africa, likely at very low frequency through historical gene flow
  • Occasional steppe-adjacent or Central Asian contexts, where western Eurasian lineages sometimes appear through mobility and admixture

Because the clade is so rare, its apparent distribution may partly reflect sampling noise and the structure of genealogical databases rather than a strongly patterned ancient homeland.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Rare downstream R1b lineages are often important for reconstructing fine-scale paternal history even when they are not associated with major prehistoric migrations. This clade may preserve the signature of a small lineage that passed through Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age, and later historic populations without expanding dramatically.

Potential associations with broad archaeological horizons such as Neolithic West Eurasian communities, Bronze Age mobility networks, and later Iron Age and historical-era regional populations are plausible, but for this specific branch they should be treated as contextual rather than definitive. In many cases, the real historical value of such lineages lies in connecting localized paternal descent lines to broader demographic processes like drift, founder effects, and long-term continuity.

Conclusion

R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a3a2a1b1a1b is a deeply nested and likely extremely rare R1b subclade of West Eurasian origin. Its significance is less about large-scale expansion and more about the preservation of a narrow paternal lineage through time, making it useful for understanding localized ancestry, regional continuity, and the fine structure of the R1b phylogeny.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B Aktuell ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1 ~10,000 years ago Neolithic 10,000 Jahre 2 2 0
7 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 29 0
8 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 29 0
9 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 29 2
10 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 29 0
11 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 435 9
12 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 761 0
13 R1B1A1B1A1A2C ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 763 111
14 R1B1A1B1A1A2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 1,260 0
15 R1B1A1B1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 4 1,715 70
16 R1B1A1B1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 1,789 0
17 R1B1A1B1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 1,796 15
18 R1B1A1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,085 0
19 R1B1A1B ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,317 31
20 R1B1A1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,321 0
21 R1B1A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,020 39
22 R1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,166 0
23 R1b ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 4,262 126

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

West Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1b haplogroup R1b1a1b1a1a2c1a3a2a1b1a1b is found include:

  1. Irish and British populations
  2. French, Iberian, and Low Countries populations
  3. Italian and Balkan populations
  4. Caucasus and Anatolian populations
  5. Levantine and North African populations
  6. Some Central Asian and steppe-related populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
Central Asia Low
Southern Europe Low
Western Asia Low
North Africa Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A3A2A1B1A1B. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Anglo-Saxon Aube Iron Age Bell Beaker British Chalcolithic British Late Bronze Age British Neolithic Croatian Bronze Age Norse-Scottish Northumbrian Bronze Age Scottish Bronze Age
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.