Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

C2A1A3A6A

Y-DNA Haplogroup C2A1A3A6A

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig C2A1A3A6A

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A3A6A is a downstream subclade of C2A1A3A6, a branch commonly associated with the Mongolian–Siberian steppe. Based on the parent clade's estimated time depth (~1.2 kya) and the internal structure typical of steppe-derived C2 lineages, C2A1A3A6A most plausibly arose within the last 0.5–0.8 thousand years (approximately the medieval to early modern period). The phylogenetic pattern of many C2 subclades shows star-like expansions consistent with rapid growth of particular male lineages tied to social structure (clans, lineages, or elite descent groups) rather than diffuse population-wide processes.

Subclades (if applicable)

As a recently derived terminal lineage, C2A1A3A6A currently appears as a relatively shallow branch with limited deep substructure in available public SNP-based trees. Where additional downstream SNPs are discovered, the pattern is expected to show short internal branches and a set of closely related terminal nodes reflecting recent clan expansions. In many steppe C2 subclades, downstream diversity often correlates with documented historical pedigrees or clan names when sampling density is high.

Geographical Distribution

Modern genetic surveys and targeted Y-STR/SNP testing place C2A1A3A6A predominantly across the Mongolian–Siberian steppe and adjacent regions. High frequencies or high relative representation are recorded among some Mongolic-speaking groups (Mongols, Buryats, Kalmyks) and in northern Siberian populations such as the Yakut (Sakha). The haplogroup is also found among Tungusic peoples (Evenks, Evens, Oroqen) and in parts of southern Siberian Turkic groups (Tuvans, Altaians, some Kazakh clans). Low-frequency occurrences in northeastern East Asia (Koreans, Japanese) and occasional, very rare reports of matching markers in North American indigenous samples likely reflect either historical long-distance gene flow, post-contact movements, or unresolved deep substructure and require further confirmation with high-resolution SNP data.

Historical and Cultural Significance

The timing and geographic localization of C2A1A3A6A make it plausible that its expansion was tied to medieval and post-medieval steppe social processes: tribal formation, patrilineal clan consolidation, and movements associated with the era of steppe polities (notably the Mongol period and later regional polities). While caution is warranted in equating a single Y haplogroup with any named historical group, the distribution and time depth suggest that C2A1A3A6A represents one of several male-line markers that rose in frequency through male-driven demographic events (e.g., elite reproduction, clan founder effects) on the Eurasian steppe.

Ancient DNA sampling from archaeological remains across Mongolia and Siberia has increasingly shown that C2 lineages were prominent in many nomadic contexts; high-resolution sequencing of ancient samples will be required to tie C2A1A3A6A specifically to particular archaeological cultures or named historical polities.

Conclusion

C2A1A3A6A is best interpreted as a recent, regionally concentrated Y-chromosome lineage originating on the Mongolian–Siberian steppe within the last millennium. Its characteristics—shallow internal diversity, association with steppe populations, and patchy high-frequency pockets—are consistent with clan-level expansions and male-mediated demographic events. Increased sampling, targeted SNP discovery, and more ancient DNA from medieval and post-medieval steppe contexts will clarify its precise historical role and internal branching structure. For genealogical and population studies, high-resolution SNP testing is necessary to distinguish C2A1A3A6A from closely related C2 subclades and to map its micro-geographic distribution.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis C2A1A3A6A. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 C2A1A3A6A Aktuell ~600 years ago Medieval 600 Jahre 0 0 0
2 C2A1A3A6 ~1,000 years ago Medieval 1,200 Jahre 1 0 0
3 C2A1A3A ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 2 2 0
4 C2A1A3 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 1 3 0
5 C2A1A ~6,000 years ago Chalcolithic 6,000 Jahre 4 3 0
6 C2A1 ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 3 0
7 C2A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 1 38 0
8 C2 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 2 99 24
9 C ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 3 406 35

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Central–East Asia (Mongolian–Siberian steppe)

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup C2A1A3A6A is found include:

  1. Mongolic-speaking groups (e.g., Mongols, Buryats, Kalmyks)
  2. Tungusic peoples of Siberia (e.g., Evenks, Evens, Oroqen)
  3. Yakut (Sakha) and other North Siberian populations
  4. Southern Siberian Turkic groups (e.g., Tuvans, some Altai and Kazakh clans)
  5. Selected Northeast Asian populations at low frequency (e.g., Koreans, Japanese)
  6. Very rare or isolated traces in some Indigenous North American groups (requiring confirmation)

Regionale Präsenz

Northeast Asia (Mongolia, southern Siberia) High
Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan - selected subgroups) Moderate
East Asia (northern China, Korea) Low
Northern Asia (Siberia) High
East Asia Low
North America (indigenous traces) Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~600 Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe C2A1A3A6A

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig C2A1A3A6A

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu C2A1A3A6A. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Boisman China_AmurRiverBasin_LatePaleolithic Irkutsk Culture Late Medieval Mongolian Medieval Kazakh Medieval Khuvsgul Mongol Russia_AltaiKrai_N Russia_AltaiKrai_N_Itkul Russia_EN_Kitoi Sukhbaatar Culture Ukraine_LateMedieval_Nogai Umungobi Medieval
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-15
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.