Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 is a deeply nested subclade within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits far down the phylogenetic tree, it is expected to be rare and localized, arising from a relatively recent founder event rather than representing an ancient, broadly dispersed lineage. A plausible origin in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe fits the demographic history of R1a, which expanded widely during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age and later diversified in multiple regional populations.

Given its position, this clade likely emerged after major R1a expansions had already spread across parts of Europe and Asia. The branch therefore reflects micro-regional diversification, potentially associated with small founder populations, drift, and lineage survival in populations with long-term continuity.

Subclades

As a highly derived intermediate clade, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 may have very few known downstream branches, and in many datasets it may appear only in a handful of samples. Subclade structure in such rare lineages is often incomplete because additional private SNPs are discovered as more individuals are sequenced.

Its parent lineage, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G, is the broader branch that frames its expected distribution. Any child lineages under this haplogroup would likely be even rarer and geographically restricted unless future sequencing reveals additional carriers.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to show a patchy distribution rather than a continuous one. The most plausible regions of occurrence include Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, parts of South Asia, and selected Uralic or Siberian-adjacent populations where R1a has historically been present.

In Europe, occurrences would most likely be found in populations with strong historical R1a frequencies such as Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Lithuanians, and Latvians. Outside Europe, the lineage may also appear at low frequency among Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, some Iranian-speaking groups, and Indo-Aryan-speaking populations where R1a-derived paternal lines are well documented.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although this specific subclade has no direct cultural attribution on its own, its broader R1a context connects it to major episodes of Eurasian prehistory, including the spread of steppe pastoralist ancestry, the Corded Ware horizon, and later Indo-European-associated expansions into Central and South Asia.

If this lineage is found in European samples, it may reflect the long-term survival of paternal lines associated with Bronze Age and Iron Age population movements. In South Asia and Central Asia, rare R1a subclades often represent downstream descendants of older expansions linked to Indo-Iranian and steppe-derived demographic processes. However, any direct association with a specific archaeological culture should be treated cautiously unless supported by ancient DNA evidence.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 is best understood as a rare, late-forming R1a subclade with likely origins in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe around 3 thousand years ago. Its significance lies not in broad frequency but in what it reveals about fine-scale paternal continuity, founder effects, and the branching history of one of Eurasia's most widespread Y-DNA lineages.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 158 3
7 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 336 0
8 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 359 4
9 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 445 0
10 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
11 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
12 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
13 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
14 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
15 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
16 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic Low
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Northern Europe Low
Central Asia Low
South Asia Low
West Asia Low
Northwestern Europe Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Late Antique Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.