Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is a very deep and rare subclade within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits far downstream in the phylogenetic tree, it likely reflects a localized founder event followed by limited expansion rather than a large-scale early demographic radiation.

The most plausible geographic context for its formation is Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe, where many R1a branches diversified during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age. Given the parent clade context and the expected rarity of this terminal branch, it is reasonable to infer a relatively recent age on the order of ~3 kya, though exact estimates would require direct sampling and phylogenetic dating from published datasets.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch in the provided classification, R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C appears to represent a highly specific descendant lineage rather than a broad, well-characterized clade with many named downstream branches. In practical population-genetic terms, such a lineage often marks a small paternal cluster within a larger R1a network.

If additional downstream SNPs are discovered, they may reveal further micro-branches associated with particular kin groups, regional isolates, or historically documented founder effects.

Geographical Distribution

This haplogroup is expected to be patchily distributed rather than broadly common. Its likely presence aligns with regions where R1a has been historically frequent and diverse:

  • Eastern Europe: especially in populations such as Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Lithuanians, and Latvians.
  • Scandinavia: where R1a lineages are present at lower but meaningful frequencies, especially in Sweden and Norway.
  • Central Asia: including Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related groups shaped by steppe-era paternal gene flow.
  • South Asia: particularly among some Indo-Aryan-speaking populations, where R1a lineages are widespread due to historical and prehistoric movements.
  • Iranian-speaking and other West Eurasian groups: where secondary dispersals of R1a occurred.
  • Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations: likely through admixture and steppe-mediated contact.

Because this is a rare derived branch, it may appear only sporadically in these regions, often in specific families or localized subpopulations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Broad R1a ancestry is strongly associated with the Pontic-Caspian steppe horizon and later expansions linked to Corded Ware, Sintashta, and related Bronze Age groups. While this specific lineage is too rare to be tied securely to a single archaeological culture, its ancestry is consistent with the broader demographic processes that spread R1a across Eurasia.

The downstream age of R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C suggests that it may have emerged during the Bronze Age to early historical period, potentially within populations experiencing mobility, elite formation, or clan-level founder effects. Such lineages can persist at low frequency within ethnolinguistic groups for centuries or millennia.

In some cases, rare R1a subclades may also reflect regional continuity within historically documented populations, preserving a paternal signal of migration, isolation, or social structure.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is a highly specific and rare paternal lineage nested within the expansive R1a haplogroup. Its distribution is expected to be limited and uneven, but its phylogenetic position points to a Eurasian steppe/Eastern European origin and a history shaped by founder effects, mobility, and the broader spread of R1a-associated populations across Eurasia.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C Aktuell ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
3 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
4 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
5 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 0 0
6 R1A1A1B1A2B3A3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 0 0
7 R1A1A1B1A2B3A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 158 3
8 R1A1A1B1A2B3 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 336 0
9 R1A1A1B1A2B ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 1 359 4
10 R1A1A1B1A2 ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 445 0
11 R1A1A1B1A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 3 808 5
12 R1A1A1B1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 1 852 0
13 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
14 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
15 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
16 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
17 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Geschwisterzweige (1)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe or Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Scandinavians, especially Swedes and Norwegians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and other Central Asian populations
  5. Many Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups and other West Eurasian populations
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe Moderate
Central Europe Low
Baltic States Low
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Central Asia Moderate
South Asia Moderate
Western Asia Low
Northern Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B1A2B3A3A2G2C. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Austria_Avar Avar Culture Early Avar Hun Culture Hungary_AbasarBoltteto_Medieval Late Antique Norway_Sund_EBA Russia_Samara_Khazar Viking Viking Denmark
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.