Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A2A1B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A1B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A2A1B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 is a highly derived, low-frequency subclade within the broader R1a paternal lineage. Because it sits near the tip of the phylogenetic tree, it is expected to be very recent in origin, likely forming in the late Holocene after the major Bronze Age expansions that spread many R1a branches across Eurasia.

On phylogenetic grounds, its emergence is best explained by a regional founder event within an Eastern European or steppe-associated R1a-bearing population, followed by limited downstream branching and geographically patchy survival. The clade is too young and too sparse to be linked confidently to a single ancient archaeological culture, but it likely reflects post-Bronze Age demographic processes rather than the initial spread of R1a itself.

Subclades

As a terminal or near-terminal branch of R1A1A1B2A2A1B, this haplogroup may have few known or sampled child branches, and in many datasets it may appear as an intermediate marker-defined lineage awaiting finer resolution. In practice, such clades are often identified through high-resolution sequencing and can represent small paternal kindreds or local lineages that expanded briefly and remained rare.

Geographical Distribution

The distribution of R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 is expected to be patchy and discontinuous, with detections most plausibly occurring in Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, and parts of South Asia where later R1a-mediated movements are known. Its appearance in multiple macro-regions does not imply deep antiquity in each region; instead, it is consistent with recent dispersal, elite mobility, trade-linked migration, or small-scale founder effects.

Within Eastern Europe, this lineage would most plausibly be found at low frequencies among populations such as Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians, as well as Lithuanians and Latvians. In northern Europe, rare occurrences may be seen among Swedes and Norwegians, while in the east and south it may appear in Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Indo-Aryan-speaking groups, and some Iranian-speaking populations.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because this clade is so recent, its historical significance lies less in ancient migrations and more in the fine-scale reconstruction of recent paternal history. Lineages like this can illuminate medieval, early modern, or late prehistoric male-line dispersals, particularly in regions shaped by repeated population movement across the European forest zone, the Pontic-Caspian steppe, and Inner Asia.

The broader R1a background is often associated with the Corded Ware horizon in Europe and with steppe-derived expansions linked to Bronze Age Indo-Iranian dispersals in parts of Central and South Asia. However, R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 itself is more likely a descendant of those older expansions than a marker of them. Its presence in geographically distant populations should be interpreted as a consequence of later branching and migration, not as evidence that the clade originated separately in each region.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 is a rare, recently formed subclade of R1a that likely arose in Eastern Europe or the Eurasian steppe within the last few thousand years. Its scattered distribution across Eurasia reflects historical mobility and local founder effects, making it useful for high-resolution paternal genealogy and regional ancestry studies rather than for broad prehistoric reconstruction.

As with many very young Y-DNA subclades, additional sampling and full Y-chromosome sequencing may reveal a clearer internal structure and more precise geographic origin.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A2A1B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1A1A1B2A2A1B ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1A1A1B2A2A1 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 11 0
4 R1A1A1B2A2A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 11 1
5 R1A1A1B2A2 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 2 75 0
6 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
7 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
8 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
9 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
10 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
11 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
12 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A1B1 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Swedes, Norwegians, and other Scandinavians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related Central Asian populations
  5. Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Baltic States Moderate
Scandinavia Low
Central Asia Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Northeastern Europe Moderate
South Asia Low
Western Asia Low
Siberia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A2A1B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A2A1B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A2A1B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Avar Culture Cimmerian Fedorovo Culture Hungarian Bronze Age Karasuk Culture Sarmatian Culture Satan Culture Sintashta Culture Zevakinskiy Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.