Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1A1A1B2A2A3B1

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3B1

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1A1A1B2A2A3B1

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 is a very recent subclade of R1a, embedded within a paternal lineage that expanded widely across Eurasia during and after the Bronze Age. Because it sits several steps below the major R1a branches, it likely represents a small founder-derived offshoot that emerged relatively recently, probably within the last few thousand years, rather than a deep prehistoric lineage.

The broader R1a clade is strongly associated with the spread of steppe-derived paternal ancestry across Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and South Asia. This specific subclade should therefore be understood as a fine-scale descendant lineage of that much larger expansion, reflecting later micro-differentiation within populations already carrying R1a.

Subclades

As an intermediate and downstream branch, R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 may contain one or more yet-undocumented terminal branches, but publicly available population-level data for such a recent and rare lineage are usually limited. In practical terms, this haplogroup is best interpreted as part of a nested R1a phylogenetic cluster rather than as a widely distributed ancestral node.

Geographical Distribution

Because this lineage is recent and likely low-frequency, its distribution is expected to be patchy and localized rather than broad and uniform. The most plausible areas of occurrence are regions where large R1a frequencies and long-term demographic continuity make downstream diversification more likely: Eastern Europe, the Baltic region, Scandinavia, Central Asia, and parts of South Asia.

In population genetics terms, such a pattern is consistent with a lineage that may have arisen in an Eastern European or steppe-connected population and then spread through later regional movements, drift, or founder effects. Its presence in South Asian or Central Asian groups would most likely reflect historical movements of steppe-related paternal lineages rather than an ancient deep-rooted local origin in those regions.

Historical and Cultural Significance

This haplogroup has no direct archaeological signature by itself, but its parentage places it within the paternal ancestry network often discussed in relation to Corded Ware, Sintashta, Andronovo, and broader Indo-Iranian steppe expansions. For very recent subclades like this one, the most meaningful historical context is usually post-Bronze Age diversification within historically attested populations.

Potential associations with Slavic, Baltic, Germanic/Scandinavian, Iranian-speaking, and Indo-Aryan-speaking groups should be treated cautiously: these are not culture labels for the haplogroup itself, but rather demographic settings in which R1a-derived lineages are commonly found.

Interpretation in Population Genetics

The rarity and recency of R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 mean that its distribution may be shaped more by founder effects, local drift, and genealogical expansion than by deep prehistoric dispersal alone. In modern datasets, such terminal clades are often informative for reconstructing recent paternal relatedness within and between populations, especially when they appear in multiple regions linked by historical mobility.

Conclusion

R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 is a highly derived and likely rare R1a subclade with an origin most plausibly rooted in the Eastern European / Eurasian Steppe paternal continuum. Its significance lies in documenting the fine-scale branching of one of Eurasia's most widespread Y-chromosome lineages and in connecting modern population structure to long-term historical movements.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Interpretation in Population Genetics
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1A1A1B2A2A3B1. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 Aktuell ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 1 0 0
2 R1A1A1B2A2A3B ~2,000 years ago Roman Period 2,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1A1A1B2A2A3 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 0 0
4 R1A1A1B2A2A ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 3 11 1
5 R1A1A1B2A2 ~2,000 years ago Classical Antiquity 2,500 Jahre 2 75 0
6 R1A1A1B2A ~3,000 years ago Iron Age 3,000 Jahre 2 306 0
7 R1A1A1B2 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 3,500 Jahre 2 423 0
8 R1A1A1B ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,000 Jahre 2 1,567 7
9 R1A1A1 ~4,000 years ago Bronze Age 4,500 Jahre 2 1,974 0
10 R1A1A ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 1 2,016 27
11 R1A1 ~5,000 years ago Bronze Age 5,000 Jahre 2 2,052 0
12 R1a ~22,000 years ago Mesolithic 22,000 Jahre 2 2,176 37
Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

Eastern Europe / Eurasian Steppe

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1A1A1B2A2A3B1 is found include:

  1. Poles, Ukrainians, Belarusians, and Russians
  2. Lithuanians and Latvians
  3. Swedes, Norwegians, and other Scandinavians
  4. Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, and related Central Asian populations
  5. Indo-Aryan-speaking populations in South Asia
  6. Some Iranian-speaking groups
  7. Selected Siberian and Uralic-speaking populations

Regionale Präsenz

Eastern Europe High
Central Europe Moderate
Northern Europe (Scandinavia) Low
Western Europe (diaspora) Low
South Asia Low
Caucasus & West Asia Low
North America (diaspora) Low
Baltic Region Moderate
Central Asia Low
Western Asia Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  3. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  4. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  5. ~2k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1A1A1B2A2A3B1

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1A1A1B2A2A3B1

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1A1A1B2A2A3B1. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Avar Culture Ayousaigoukou Culture Dongtalede Culture Eminhuojierte Culture Krasnoyarsk Culture Saka Saka Culture Tasmola Culture Tasmola-Saka Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.