Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Y-DNA · Väterliche Linie

R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2

Y-DNA Haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den Y-DNA-Abstammungszweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2

Origins and Evolution

Y-DNA haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2 is a very deeply nested branch of R1b, one of the most geographically widespread paternal lineages in western Eurasia. Because it sits far down the phylogenetic tree, it almost certainly represents a late derivative of a much older western Eurasian paternal continuum rather than an independent major founder lineage.

Based on the parent clade's inferred age and geographic context, this subclade most plausibly emerged in West Eurasia around the early Holocene or later Neolithic/Chalcolithic period. Its rarity suggests it did not experience the broad demographic expansions seen in major R1b branches such as R1b-P312 or R1b-L23-derived steppe lineages, but instead persisted through small founder populations, local isolation, and stochastic drift.

Subclades

As an intermediate and highly derived Y-DNA branch, R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2 is best understood in relation to its immediate parent and nearby sister lineages rather than through well-characterized internal structure. At present, it should be treated as a private or ultra-rare terminal subclade unless additional downstream branches are identified in future sequencing studies.

Its phylogenetic significance lies in helping refine the branching history of rare R1b diversity in western Eurasia and adjacent regions. Such lineages are often informative for reconstructing local population history, especially where long-term continuity and founder effects have produced distinctive paternal signatures.

Geographical Distribution

This lineage is expected to occur at very low frequency in a scattered pattern across the wider western Eurasian world. The parent clade context suggests presence or occasional detection in Irish and British populations, French and Iberian populations, the Low Countries, Italian and Balkan groups, Anatolian and Caucasus populations, Levantine groups, and parts of North Africa, with sporadic appearances farther east in steppe-connected or Central Asian contexts.

Because the lineage is so rare, its distribution is likely better described as patchy and localized than as a coherent regional marker. Any present-day concentrations would probably reflect historical migration, elite movement, small founder events, or genealogical persistence within isolated lineages rather than deep population-wide prevalence.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Although no single archaeological culture can be securely assigned to this exact subclade, its broader R1b background connects it to major prehistoric processes in Eurasia, including Neolithic to Bronze Age mobility, post-glacial expansions, and later regional dispersals. Depending on the exact deeper branch structure, related R1b lineages may have participated in movements associated with Bell Beaker, Yamnaya, Corded Ware, and steppe-derived Bronze Age networks.

For a lineage this rare, the most important historical signal is not mass migration but microhistory: family persistence, local lineage survival, and the survival of a small number of paternal lines across centuries or millennia. Such haplogroups can illuminate hidden genealogical connections that are otherwise invisible in population-level surveys.

Conclusion

R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2 is a highly derived and exceptionally rare western Eurasian Y-DNA lineage. Its likely history reflects deep ancestry within R1b, followed by long-term drift, isolation, and patchy regional survival, making it more valuable as a marker of fine-scale paternal genealogy than as a broad population signature.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Conclusion
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2 Aktuell ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 0 0 0
2 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B ~12,000 years ago Neolithic 12,000 Jahre 1 0 0
3 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 19 0
4 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 40 1
5 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 49 0
6 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 49 2
7 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 49 0
8 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 72 5
9 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 7 83 0
10 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 435 9
11 R1B1A1B1A1A2C1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 761 0
12 R1B1A1B1A1A2C ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 763 111
13 R1B1A1B1A1A2 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 6 1,260 0
14 R1B1A1B1A1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 4 1,715 70
15 R1B1A1B1A1 ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 1 1,789 0
16 R1B1A1B1A ~14,000 years ago Mesolithic 14,000 Jahre 2 1,796 15
17 R1B1A1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,085 0
18 R1B1A1B ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,317 31
19 R1B1A1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 2,321 0
20 R1B1A ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,020 39
21 R1B1 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 2 4,166 0
22 R1b ~20,000 years ago Mesolithic 20,000 Jahre 2 4,262 126

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

West Eurasia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where Y-DNA haplogroup R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2 is found include:

  1. Irish and British populations
  2. French, Iberian, and Low Countries populations
  3. Italian and Balkan populations
  4. Caucasus and Anatolian populations
  5. Levantine and North African populations
  6. Some Central Asian and steppe-related populations

Regionale Präsenz

Western Europe Low
Northern Europe Low
Iberia (Southwest Europe) Low
Central Europe Low
Near East / Western Asia Low
Southern Europe Low
Eastern Europe Low
Near East Low
Central Asia Low
North Africa Low
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~12k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses Y-DNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  2. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den Y-DNA-Zweig R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu R1B1A1B1A1A2C1A1A1A1A1B2. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

1984 British Iron Age Early British Iron Age East Yorkshire Faroese Medieval French Middle Iron Age British Modern Norse Norse-Irish
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
PATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-06-17
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.