Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A man buried in China in the Historical era
Ancient Individual

A man buried in China in the Historical era

A man buried in China during the Banda Period China

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

BandaKD15
433 CE - 598 CE
Male
China
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

BandaKD15

Date Range

433 CE - 598 CE

Cultural Period

Banda Period China

Biological Sex

Male

mtDNA Haplogroup

A5b1b

Y-DNA Haplogroup

Not available

Social Role

Laborer (AI estimate, era-typical)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country China
Locality Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

BandaKD15 433 CE - 598 CE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Banda Period in China, often associated with the Yao people in the region of Guangxi, primarily during the Northern and Southern Dynasties through to the Sui and Tang Dynasties, represents a fascinating chapter in the historical and cultural evolution of Southern China.

Historical Context

Northern and Southern Dynasties (420–589 AD)

During this time, China was characterized by political fragmentation and frequent warfare as the Northern and Southern Dynasties vied for supremacy. The area that is today known as Guangxi was not directly under the authority of either dynasty for much of this period, allowing for the preservation and flourishing of indigenous cultures like the Yao.

Sui Dynasty (581–618 AD)

The Sui Dynasty marked the reunification of China, albeit temporarily. The imperial administration sought to exert influence over the southern regions, leading to increased interaction with the Yao people. This period saw efforts at consolidation that brought infrastructure improvements, such as the extension of roads and the construction of the Grand Canal, which facilitated communication and trade between the north and south.

Tang Dynasty (618–907 AD)

The Tang Dynasty is often seen as a golden age of Chinese culture, economy, and diplomacy. For the Yao, this era was significant due to increased commercialization and cultural exchange. The Tang administration was generally more tolerant and inclusive of various ethnic groups, which allowed the Yao to maintain some level of autonomy while engaging more actively in trade networks.

The Yao People and Their Culture

Social Structure and Lifestyle

The Yao people of the Banda Period were organized into clan-based societal structures, often living in small, autonomous communities. Their society was primarily agrarian, relying on farming, hunting, and gathering for sustenance. They were skilled at cultivating rice, a staple in their diet, and practiced shifting cultivation techniques suitable for the hilly terrain of Guangxi.

Beliefs and Traditions

The Yao maintained a unique set of beliefs and practices distinct from the Han Chinese. They had rich oral traditions and were known for their intricate rituals and festivals, celebrating important life events and agricultural cycles. Their religious customs often involved ancestor worship and animistic practices, wherein natural elements were believed to hold spiritual significance.

Art and Clothing

Yao art, especially their textile work, was vibrant and skillfully crafted. They were known for their exquisite embroidery and woven cloth, featuring motifs that held cultural and spiritual significance. Clothing often included elaborate headdresses and colorful attire, which served as markers of identity and social status within the community.

Interaction with Han China

Trade and Economy

Trade played an important role in relations between the Yao and the Han Chinese. The Yao exchanged local products such as medicinal herbs, precious stones, and forest products for Han goods, including salt, iron tools, and silk. Markets and trade routes facilitated cultural exchange and economic interdependence.

Cultural Exchange and Influence

Though largely autonomous, the Yao were influenced by Han culture over time, especially in areas accessible via trade routes or military expeditions. Chinese literary, architectural, and technical influences gradually permeated into Yao society. Conversely, the Han were influenced by Yao herbal medicine and agriculture, adding to the rich tapestry of Tang China’s multi-ethnic makeup.

Legacy and Significance

The Banda Period in Guangxi under the Northern and Southern Dynasties, Sui, and Tang represents a time of cultural resilience and adaptation for the Yao people. Despite external pressures and incursions, they maintained their distinct cultural identity while also contributing to the broader fabric of what is known as Chinese civilization. This era highlights the complexity of cultural interactions in historic China and underscores the diversity that characterized Imperial China.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BalongKD06 Balong Jin Period China 250 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD07 Balong Jin Period China 262 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD08 Balong Jin Period China 250 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BalongKD10 Balong Jin Period China 382 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Balong Cave, China View
BandaKD11 Banda Period China 484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
BandaKD15 Banda Period China 433 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
Baojianshan5_M1 China Guangxi Baojianshan Neolithic 6400 BCE Guangxi. Chongzuo City. Longzhou County. Baojianshan Cave A, China View
Baojianshan5_M2 China Guangxi Baojianshan Neolithic 6400 BCE Guangxi. Chongzuo City. Longzhou County. Baojianshan Cave A, China View
CenxunKP05 Tang Dynasty China 484 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
CenxunKP07 Tang Dynasty China 584 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
CenxunKP13 Tang Dynasty China 440 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Taiping Town. Cenxun Cave, China View
Dushan4_1 Neolithic Guangxi Dushan, China 7025 BCE Guangxi. Dushan, China View
GaofengNL23 Qing Dynasty China 1530 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Gaofeng Cave, China View
HuaqiaoNL26 Ming Dynasty China 1437 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huaqiao Village. Baitai Mountain. Huaqiao Caves, China View
HuatuyanNL02 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL04 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL06 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL11 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1474 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL17 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1442 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL18 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL19 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1495 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
HuatuyanNL21 China Guangxi Huatuyan Ming 1456 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Nandan County. Lihu Yaozu Town. Huatu Village. Huatuyan Cave, China View
LadaKH01 China Guangxi Lada Northern And Southern Dynasties Sui Tang 484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Jinchengjiang District. Lada Cave, China View
LayiKD01 Layi Period China 419 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Beijing Town. Baida Village. Layi Cave, China View
Longlin_1 Epipaleolithic Guangxi Longlin, China 9853 BCE Guangxi. Longlin Cave, China View
Qihe3 Epipaleolithic China 9798 BCE Fujian. Zhangping. Qihe Cave, China View
QinchangKD13 Qinchang Period China 431 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Yantan Town. Qinchang Cave, China View
QinchangKD14 Qinchang Period China 406 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Yantan Town. Qinchang Cave, China View
ShenxianKP09 China Guangxi Shenxian Sui Tang 601 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Shenxian Cave, China View
Yinwang China Guangxi Yinwang Ming 1400 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Liming Township. Liming Village. Nian Mountain. Yinwang Cave, China View
YiyangKP17 Northern and Southern Dynasties 484 CE Guangxi. Baise City. Pingguo County. Yiyang Cave, China View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BandaKD11 Banda Period China 484 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
BandaKD15 Banda Period China 433 CE Guangxi. Hechi City. Dahua Yao Autonomous County. Banda Cave, China View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Human population history at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia since 11,000 years ago

Authors Wang T, Wang W, Xie G, Li Z, Fan X et al.
Abstract

Past human genetic diversity and migration between southern China and Southeast Asia have not been well characterized, in part due to poor preservation of ancient DNA in hot and humid regions. We sequenced 31 ancient genomes from southern China (Guangxi and Fujian), including two ∼12,000- to 10,000-year-old individuals representing the oldest humans sequenced from southern China. We discovered a deeply diverged East Asian ancestry in the Guangxi region that persisted until at least 6,000 years ago. We found that ∼9,000- to 6,000-year-old Guangxi populations were a mixture of local ancestry, southern ancestry previously sampled in Fujian, and deep Asian ancestry related to Southeast Asian Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers, showing broad admixture in the region predating the appearance of farming. Historical Guangxi populations dating to ∼1,500 to 500 years ago are closely related to Tai-Kadai and Hmong-Mien speakers. Our results show heavy interactions among three distinct ancestries at the crossroads of East and Southeast Asia.

Use code for 20% off Expires Jul 22