Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in Turkey in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Turkey in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic era

A woman buried in Turkey during the Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

mus005
7457 BCE - 7083 BCE
Female
Turkey
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

mus005

Date Range

7457 BCE - 7083 BCE

Cultural Period

Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

K1a4

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Turkey
Locality Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç)
Coordinates 38.3480, 34.2290
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

mus005 7457 BCE - 7083 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic period is a fascinating era in the broader context of early Anatolian prehistory, dating roughly between 9500-7000 BCE. This epoch marks a transformative period when human societies shifted from mobile hunter-gatherer groups to more sedentary, agricultural communities. This change brought with it profound social, economic, and technological advancements that laid the foundation for future civilizations in the region.

Geography and Environment

Central Anatolia, located in modern-day Turkey, is characterized by a diverse range of environments, including fertile plains, rugged mountains, and numerous rivers. During the Pre-Pottery Neolithic period, the region experienced a climate that was transitioning from the cooler, wetter conditions of the early Holocene to a slightly warmer and drier climate. This environmental change played a crucial role in the development of agriculture, as it affected the availability of resources and the types of crops that could be cultivated.

Settlements and Architecture

One of the most significant aspects of this era is the establishment of permanent settlements. Communities began building substantial structures, often with circular or rectangular designs, using mudbrick or stone. Notable archaeological sites from this period include Çatalhöyük, Aşıklı Höyük, and Boncuklu Höyük. These settlements were often organized with tightly clustered buildings, which suggests a high degree of social cohesion and cooperation.

The architecture of these sites provides insights into the daily lives of their inhabitants. For instance, at Çatalhöyük, houses were closely packed and accessed via rooftops, indicating an innovative use of space and a communal approach to living. The presence of purpose-built structures for storage and ritual activities suggests a complex social structure with specialized roles.

Economy and Agriculture

The Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic was a pioneering era for agriculture. The domestication of plants such as wheat, barley, and legumes marked the beginnings of an agricultural economy. This agricultural base was supplemented by the continued practice of hunting and gathering, which remained important for subsistence.

The transition to agriculture facilitated population growth and allowed societies to support larger, more stable communities. This increase in food production led to the development of trade networks, as surplus goods could be exchanged for resources not locally available. These exchanges helped spread technological innovations and cultural ideas across the region.

Technology and Tools

Advancements in tool-making were significant during this period. Obsidian, a naturally occurring volcanic glass abundant in Central Anatolia, became a critical resource for producing sharp-edged tools. Such tools were essential for agricultural activities, construction, and crafting. The intricate and deliberate craftsmanship of these tools suggests a sophisticated understanding of materials and their properties.

Social Structure and Culture

The social organization of the Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic communities was likely complex and multilayered. Evidence from burial practices indicates an emerging social stratification, with some individuals receiving more elaborate interments than others. This could suggest differences in status, occupation, or lineage.

Cultural life flourished during this era, as evidenced by artistic and ritualistic artifacts. Figurines, often depicting humans or animals, have been unearthed at several sites, suggesting a rich symbolic and possibly religious culture. Ritualistic practices likely played a crucial role in reinforcing social bonds and shared identity.

Art and Symbolism

Artistic expression thrived in these early Anatolian communities. Wall paintings, carvings, and small sculptures have been discovered, reflecting a vibrant symbolic culture. The use of symbolic motifs and figures in art might have been connected to religious beliefs, social status, or communal identity. Such artwork provides an invaluable insight into the cognitive world of these early societies and their perceptions of the world around them.

Conclusion

The Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic period was a time of dynamic change and development. The inception of agriculture, permanent settlements, and complex social structures marked significant milestones in human history. This era laid the groundwork for future civilizations in Anatolia and beyond, influencing the cultural and technological trajectory of the broader Near East region. Through the lens of archaeology, we can glimpse the richness and complexity of these early communities and appreciate their contributions to the tapestry of human history.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BOG019 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 100 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG020 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 130 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG024 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 130 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG028 Modern Turkish (Boğazköy-Hattuša) 1000-1900 CE 1000 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
CTG025 Bronze Age Aegean Culture of Aydin 2015 BCE Çine-Tepecik (Aydın, Çine), Turkey View
G23 Early Bronze Age Theopetra Culture 2343 BCE Theopetra Cave (Thessaly), Greece View
G31 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G37 Early Bronze Age Sarakenos Cave Culture 2476 BCE Boeotia, Sarakenos Cave (Thessalia-Central Greece, Stereas Elladas), Greece View
G62 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G65 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G66 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G76a Early Helladic Perachora 2570 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
geo005 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1260 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
geo006 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1043 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
geo015 Kura-Araxes Culture 3017 BCE Doghlauri (Shida Kartli, Kareli), Georgia View
geo017 Doghlauri culture of Georgia 1375 BCE Doghlauri (Shida Kartli, Kareli), Georgia View
geo029 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1222 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
Gordion002 Central Anatolian Iron Age Culture (Gordion) 323 BCE Gordion (Central, Ankara), Turkey View
gur016 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur017 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur019 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
mus005 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7457 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
mus006 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7311 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
sha003 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha004 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3489 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha006 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha007 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3369 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha008 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha009 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3346 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha010 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha012 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
ksha014 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
ulu117 Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture 4000 BCE Ulucak Höyük (İzmir, Kemalpaşa), Turkey View
zrj003 Shamakhi Culture 205 CE Shamakhi, Azerbaijan View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
mus005 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7457 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
mus006 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7311 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in human mobility patterns in Holocene Southwest Asia and the East Mediterranean

Authors Koptekin D, Yüncü E, Rodríguez-Varela R, Altınışık NE, Psonis N et al.
Abstract

We present a spatiotemporal picture of human genetic diversity in Anatolia, Iran, Levant, South Caucasus, and the Aegean, a broad region that experienced the earliest Neolithic transition and the emergence of complex hierarchical societies. Combining 35 new ancient shotgun genomes with 382 ancient and 23 present-day published genomes, we found that genetic diversity within each region steadily increased through the Holocene. We further observed that the inferred sources of gene flow shifted in time. In the first half of the Holocene, Southwest Asian and the East Mediterranean populations homogenized among themselves. Starting with the Bronze Age, however, regional populations diverged from each other, most likely driven by gene flow from external sources, which we term "the expanding mobility model." Interestingly, this increase in inter-regional divergence can be captured by outgroup-f3-based genetic distances, but not by the commonly used FST statistic, due to the sensitivity of FST, but not outgroup-f3, to within-population diversity. Finally, we report a temporal trend of increasing male bias in admixture events through the Holocene.

Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 12