Zum Hauptinhalt springen
mtDNA · Mütterliche Linie

F2I

mtDNA Haplogroup F2I

Ein Referenzprofil für einen Abstammungszweig. Gemeinsame Haplogruppen begründen weder eine familiäre Beziehung noch eine kulturelle Identität.

Referenzprofil

Hintergrund des Zweigs

Historischer Kontext für den mtDNA-Abstammungszweig F2I

Origins and Evolution

mtDNA haplogroup F2I is a downstream lineage of haplogroup F2, itself a branch of macro-haplogroup F common in East and Southeast Asia. Based on the position of F2I in the mtDNA phylogeny and the age estimate of its parent clade, F2I most plausibly arose in the early Holocene (~9 kya), during a period of post-glacial population expansion and increasing regional sedentism. The clade likely formed by one or a few defining mutations on the F2 backbone and remained at low-to-moderate frequency while dispersing with local female-mediated movements.

Subclades (if applicable)

F2I is a relatively narrow subclade within F2; published population surveys report it as uncommon compared with other F sublineages. Where data permit, F2I sometimes resolves into further minor branches restricted to particular language groups or island populations, but the sub-structure is limited by sampling. Ongoing sequencing of complete mitogenomes may reveal additional internal structure and refine coalescence dates.

Geographical Distribution

F2I shows a concentrated distribution in East and Southeast Asia, with occurrences documented among Han Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Tai-Kadai groups (e.g., Zhuang), and various Austronesian-speaking populations (Formosan groups, Philippines, parts of Indonesia and Malaysia). It is also found at low to moderate frequencies in some Mainland Southeast Asian populations (Lao, Khmer), among certain Tibeto-Burman groups, and in a few island populations in Near Oceania. Low-frequency occurrences reported in parts of Central Asia and southern Siberia likely reflect gene flow and historical contacts rather than primary origin.

Historical and Cultural Significance

Because F2I is nested within a lineage that expanded across East and Southeast Asia after the Last Glacial Maximum, it is useful for reconstructing maternal continuity and local demographic events in the early Holocene and the later Neolithic dispersals. The haplogroup appears in modern Austronesian-speaking populations and therefore contributes to genetic signals associated with the Austronesian expansion into Taiwan, Island Southeast Asia, and Near Oceania. Occurrences in Jomon-associated contexts or in Japanese populations can reflect ancient north–south interactions in the Japanese archipelago. One archaeological (aDNA) detection in public databases shows the clade does appear in prehistoric contexts, providing direct temporal anchors for its antiquity.

Research and Practical Notes

  • F2I tends to be rarer than some other East Asian mtDNA lineages (for example, haplogroups B4 and M7) but is informative for fine-scale regional phylogeography.
  • Interpretation benefits from complete mitogenome data and dense population sampling, particularly across Taiwan, the Philippines, and island Southeast Asia where Austronesian dispersals left complex maternal signatures.
  • Co-occurrence with particular Y-DNA lineages (for example, O1 and O2 sublineages) is typical for many East/Southeast Asian populations but does not imply strict sex-biased migration patterns on its own.

Conclusion

mtDNA haplogroup F2I represents a localized maternal lineage derived from F2 that emerged in the early Holocene in East/Southeast Asia. Its distribution—across mainland East Asia, MSEA, Austronesian-speaking island populations, and some Near Oceanic groups—makes it a useful marker for studying regional demographic processes such as post-glacial re-expansion, Neolithic farmer dispersals, and later Austronesian movements. Continued complete mitogenome sequencing and ancient DNA sampling will improve resolution of its internal structure and historical dynamics.

Wichtige Punkte

  • Origins and Evolution
  • Subclades (if applicable)
  • Geographical Distribution
  • Historical and Cultural Significance
  • Research and Practical Notes
Referenzprofil

Baum und Verwandtschaft

Phylogenetischer Kontext und Subkladen

Entwicklungsweg

Folgen Sie den erfassten übergeordneten Zweigen bis F2I. Die Daten sind Schätzungen und können sich ändern, wenn Referenzdaten überarbeitet werden.

Schritte Haplogruppe Altersschätzung Archäologische Epoche Vergangene Zeit Unmittelbare Nachkommen Getestete moderne Nachkommen Antike Verknüpfungen
1 F2I Aktuell ~9,000 years ago Neolithic 9,000 Jahre 0 1 0
2 F2 ~18,000 years ago Mesolithic 18,000 Jahre 7 55 0
3 F ~28,000 years ago Paleolithic 28,000 Jahre 4 265 6
4 R9 ~40,000 years ago Paleolithic 40,000 Jahre 3 281 0
5 R ~55,000 years ago Paleolithic 55,000 Jahre 17 22,830 57
6 NA - - - 1 22,830 0
7 N ~60,000 years ago Paleolithic 60,000 Jahre 16 26,150 13
8 L3 ~70,000 years ago Paleolithic 70,000 Jahre 7 30,162 6
9 L3'4 - - - 2 30,212 0
10 L3'4'6 - - - 2 30,216 0
11 L2'3'4'6 - - - 2 31,333 0
12 L2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,349 0
13 L1'2'3'4'5'6'7 - - - 2 31,852 0
14 L ~160,000 years ago Paleolithic 160,000 Jahre 2 32,236 5

Subkladen (0)

Endzweig ohne erfasste Subkladen

Geschwisterzweige (6)

Weitere Zweige derselben übergeordneten Haplogruppe

Referenzprofil

Verbreitung weltweit

Geografische Verbreitung und moderne Präsenz

Erfasster Ursprung

East / Southeast Asia

Moderne Verbreitung

The populations where mtDNA haplogroup F2I is found include:

  1. Han Chinese
  2. Japanese (including Jomon/Yayoi descendant groups)
  3. Koreans
  4. Vietnamese
  5. Thai and other Tai-Kadai speaking groups (e.g., Zhuang)
  6. Austronesian-speaking populations (Taiwanese Indigenous/Formosan, Filipinos, Indonesians, Malays)
  7. Tibeto-Burman groups (low to moderate frequencies)
  8. Indigenous groups of Mainland Southeast Asia (e.g., Lao, Khmer)
  9. Indigenous and admixed populations in Near Oceania (low to moderate frequencies in some island populations)
  10. Certain Central Asian and southern Siberian groups (generally low frequencies)
Historischer Kontext

Ein Zweig durch die Zeit

Geschätzte Entstehung in einer breiten historischen Zeitleiste. Zeitmarken liefern Kontext und implizieren keine Verbindung zu bestimmten Kulturen.

  1. ~10k Jahre zurück

    Neolithische Revolution

    Beginn der Landwirtschaft und feste Siedlungen

  2. ~9k Jahre zurück

    Haplogruppe F2I

    Geschätzte Entstehung dieses mtDNA-Zweigs; Daten und Orte sind Referenzschätzungen.

    Dieser Zweig
  3. ~5k Jahre zurück

    Bronzezeit

    Metallverarbeitung, Schrift und frühe Zivilisationen

  4. ~3k Jahre zurück

    Eisenzeit

    Eisenwerkzeuge und ausgedehnte Handelsnetze

  5. ~2.5k Jahre zurück

    Klassische Antike

    Blüte griechischer und römischer Kulturen

  6. Gegenwart

    Gegenwart

    Moderne Zeit

Referenzprofil

Archäologischer Kontext

Erfasste archäologische Zuordnungen für den mtDNA-Zweig F2I

Erfasste Zuordnungen

Diese Bezeichnungen beschreiben archäologische Kontexte erfasster Referenzproben mit Bezug zu F2I. Eine Zuordnung bedeutet nicht, dass alle Träger einer Kultur angehörten oder einer bestimmten Migrationsroute folgten.

Banda Culture Early Kazakh Iron Kafulang Culture Khovsgol Culture Late Medieval Mongolian Late Xiongnu Medieval Mongolia Medieval Nomadic Roman Republic Yellow River Culture
Kulturzuordnungen basieren auf dem archäologischen Kontext antiker DNA-Proben und können regionale Verknüpfungen in bestimmten Zeiträumen widerspiegeln.
MATERNAL LINEAGE · ANCIENT DNA

Ancient lineage evidence map

Follow parent clades toward this branch and explore where ancient carriers were found.

Loading ancient observations…

Markers are archaeological find locations. A dashed connector is an uncertain, proposed geographic transition between consecutive branches supported by multiple dated observations; it is not an exact travel route, birthplace or proof of direct descent. Parent-clade samples may belong to other descendant branches. Gaps remain where evidence is insufficient. Sample dates differ from haplogroup formation dates.

Daten

Daten und Herkunft

Quellenangaben und Datenqualität

Zuletzt aktualisiert 2026-04-20
Konfidenzwert 50/100
Abdeckung Low

Datenquelle

Klassifikation, geschätzte Daten und geografischer Kontext spiegeln die erfassten Referenzdaten wider und können sich bei überarbeiteten Belegen ändern. Die Probenabdeckung ist ungleichmäßig; erfasste Orte und archäologische Zuordnungen begründen weder persönliche Herkunft noch kulturelle Identität.