Menu
Research Publication

How local reference panels improve imputation in French populations.

Herzig Anthony F, AF Velo-Suárez, Lourdes L et al.

38172507 PubMed ID
82 Authors
2024-01-03 Published
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

HA
Herzig Anthony F
AV
AF Velo-Suárez
LL
Lourdes L
DC
Dina Christian
CR
C Redon
RR
Richard R
DJ
Deleuze Jean-François
JG
JF Génin
EE
Emmanuelle E
CD
Campion Dominique
DD
D Dartigues
JJ
Jean-François JF
LJ
Lambert Jean-Charles
JL
JC Ludwig
TT
Thomas T
GB
Grenier-Boley Benjamin
BL
B Letort
SS
Sébastien S
LP
Lindenbaum Pierre
PM
P Meyer
VV
Vincent V
QO
Quenez Olivier
OB
O Bellenguez
CC
Céline C
CC
Clézio Camille Charbonnier-Le
CG
CC Giemza
JJ
Joanna J
CS
Chatel Stéphanie
SF
S Férec
CC
Claude C
LM
Le Marec Hervé
HL
H Letenneur
LL
Luc L
NG
Nicolas Gaël
GR
G Rouault
KK
Karen K
BD
Bacq Delphine
DB
D Boland
AA
Anne A
LD
Lechner Doris
DA
D Adjou
CC
Chantal C
CS
Chatel Stéphanie
SF
S Férec
CC
Claude C
GM
Goldberg Marcel
MH
M Halbout
PP
Philippe-Antoine PA
LM
Le Marec Hervé
HL
H L'Helgouach
DD
David D
RK
Rouault Karen
KS
K Schott
JJ
Jean-Jacques JJ
VA
Vogelsperger Anne
AZ
A Zins
MM
Marie M
BD
Bacq Delphine
DB
D Blanché
HH
Hélène H
BA
Boland Anne
AO
A Olaso
RR
Robert R
LP
Lindenbaum Pierre
PL
P Ludwig
TT
Thomas T
MV
Meyer Vincent
VS
V Sandron
FF
Florian F
DD
Delafoy Damien
DV
D Velo-Suárez
LL
Lourdes L
AI
Alves Isabel
IB
I Bocher
OO
Ozvan O
HA
Herzig Anthony F
AK
AF Karakachoff
MM
Matilde M
MG
Marenne Gaëlle
GP
G Pierre
AS
Aude Saint AS
GV
Geoffroy Véronique
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Imputation servers offer the exclusive possibility to harness the largest public reference panels which have been shown to deliver very high precision in the imputation of European genomes. Many studies have nonetheless stressed the importance of 'study specific panels' (SSPs) as an alternative and have shown the benefits of combining public reference panels with SSPs. But such combined approaches are not attainable when using external imputation servers. To investigate how to confront this challenge, we imputed 550 French individuals using either the University of Michigan imputation server with the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) panel or an in-house SSP of 850 whole-genome sequenced French individuals. With approximate geo-localization of both our target and SSP individuals we are able to pinpoint different scenarios where SSP-based imputation would be preferred over server-based imputation or vice-versa. This is achieved by showing to a high degree of resolution the importance of the proximity of the reference panel to target individuals; with a focus on the clear added value of SSPs for estimating haplotype phase and for the imputation of rare variants (minor allele-frequency below 0.01). Such benefits were most evident for individuals from the same geographical regions in France as the SSP individuals. Overall, only 42.3% of all 125,442 variants evaluated were better imputed with an SSP from France compared to an external reference panel, however this rises to 58.1% for individuals from geographic regions well covered by the SSP. By investigating haplotype sharing and population fine-structure in France, we show the importance of including SSP haplotypes for imputation but also that they should ideally be combined with large public panels. In the absence of the unattainable results from a combined panel of the HRC and our French SSP, we put forward a pragmatic solution where server-based and SSP-based imputation outcomes can be combined based on comparing posterior genotype probabilities. We show that such an approach can give a level of imputation accuracy in excess of what could be achieved with either strategy alone. The results presented provide detailed insights into the accuracy of imputation that should be expected from different strategies for European populations.

Chapter III

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment