Genome of an early Okhotsk individual reveals ancient admixture between Jomon and Kamchatka lineages
Takehiro Sato, Daisuke Kubo, Yu Hirasawa et al.
Publication Details
Comprehensive information about this research publication
Abstract
Summary of the research findings
The prehistoric Okhotsk culture was distributed along the southern coastal regions of the Sea of Okhotsk during the late first millennium AD. A previous study that performed whole-genome sequencing of a late Okhotsk individual suggested two migration waves from the Russian Far East to northern Japan. The first wave is estimated to have originated from the Kamchatka Peninsula around 2000 years before present (BP), and the second from the Amur Basin around 1600 BP. These findings suggest the past existence of an admixed hypothetical population between the Kamchatka and indigenous Jomon lineages in northern Japan between 2000 and 1600 BP, although direct genetic evidence has not yet been obtained. Here, we present the genome data of an early Okhotsk individual (NAT004) excavated from northern Japan. Admixture modelling reveals that the genome can be explained as a mixture of Kamchatka and Jomon ancestries, providing direct support for the existence of the previously hypothesized hypothetical population. This result offers new insights into the prehistoric population dynamics of northern Japan and contributes to the broader understanding of its archaeological and anthropological history.
Analysis
Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings
Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.