Genetic formation and regional disparities of Kra-Dai and Hmong-Mien speakers inferred from ancient genomes of cave burial populations in southwest China.
Tao Le, L Xie, Ying Y et al.
Publication Details
Comprehensive information about this research publication
Abstract
Summary of the research findings
Cave burial is a funerary practice believed to be associated with modern Kra-Dai (KD) and Hmong-Mien (HM) speakers for thousands of years. However, the extent to which these ancient cave burial practitioners contributed to the formation of modern ethnic minority groups remains poorly understood due to the limited ancient genomic data. We generated 14 newly sequenced ancient human genomes from cave burial sites in Guangxi. The findings reveal continuous gene flow from northern lineages into ancient cave burial populations, shaping their genetic profiles over time. We observed a significant genetic distinction in HM populations: Southeast Asian HM groups derive 74.8% to 100% of their ancestry from cave burials, preserving a robust ancient southern genetic signature, while Chinese HM populations exhibit only 11.1% to 37.2% ancient cave burial ancestry, but heavily admixed with Yellow River-related populations (14.7% to 52.1%), reflecting differential historical interactions with northern migrants. In contrast, most KD speakers maintain tight genetic clustering with Guangxi ancestors (28.5% to 100% contribution from cave burials). The HM formation involved admixture between ancient cave burials, northern farmers, and local KD-related groups, which is evident in the genetic cline of She and Miao populations.
Analysis
Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings
Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.