Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Preliminary genome-wide association study of bipolar disorder in the Japanese population.

Hattori E, Toyota T, Ishitsuka Y et al.

19259986 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1018 Participants
41 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

HE
Hattori E
TT
Toyota T
IY
Ishitsuka Y
IY
Iwayama Y
YK
Yamada K
UH
Ujike H
MY
Morita Y
KM
Kodama M
NK
Nakata K
MY
Minabe Y
NK
Nakamura K
IY
Iwata Y
TN
Takei N
MN
Mori N
NH
Naitoh H
YY
Yamanouchi Y
IN
Iwata N
ON
Ozaki N
KT
Kato T
NT
Nishikawa T
KA
Kashiwa A
SM
Suzuki M
SK
Shioe K
SM
Shinohara M
HM
Hirano M
NS
Nanko S
AA
Akahane A
UM
Ueno M
KN
Kaneko N
WY
Watanabe Y
ST
Someya T
HK
Hashimoto K
IM
Iyo M
IM
Itokawa M
AM
Arai M
NM
Nankai M
IT
Inada T
YS
Yoshida S
KH
Kunugi H
NM
Nakamura M
IY
Iijima Y
OY
Okazaki Y
HT
Higuchi T
YT
Yoshikawa T
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Recent progress in genotyping technology and the development of public databases has enabled large-scale genome-wide association tests with diseases. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) of bipolar disorder (BD) in Japanese cohorts. First we used Affymetrix 100K GeneChip arrays in the analysis of 107 cases with bipolar I disorder and 107 controls, and selected markers that were nominally significant (P < 0.01) in at least one of the three models (1,577 markers in total). In the follow-up stage, we analyzed these markers using an Illumina platform (1,526 markers; 51 markers were not designable for the platform) and an independent sample set, which consisted of 395 cases (bipolar I + II) and 409 controls. We also assessed the population stratification of current samples using principal components analysis. After the two-stage analysis, 89 markers remained nominally significant (allelic P < 0.05) with the same allele being consistently over-represented in both the first and the follow-up stages. However, none of these were significant after correction for multiple-testing by false discovery rates. Sample stratification was virtually negligible. Collectively, this is the first GWAS of BD in the Japanese population. But given the small sample size and the limited genomic coverage, these results should be taken as preliminary.

107 Japanese ancestry cases, 107 Japanese ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1018
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
395 Japanese ancestry cases, 409 Japanese ancestry controls
Replication Participants
East Asian
Ancestry
Japan
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.