Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Factors associated with sharing e-mail information and mental health survey participation in large population cohorts.

Adams MJ, Hill WD, Howard DM et al.

31263887 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
371417 Participants
44 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

AM
Adams MJ
HW
Hill WD
HD
Howard DM
DH
Dashti HS
DK
Davis KAS
CA
Campbell A
CT
Clarke TK
DI
Deary IJ
HC
Hayward C
PD
Porteous D
HM
Hotopf M
MA
McIntosh AM
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

People who opt to participate in scientific studies tend to be healthier, wealthier and more educated than the broader population. Although selection bias does not always pose a problem for analysing the relationships between exposures and diseases or other outcomes, it can lead to biased effect size estimates. Biased estimates may weaken the utility of genetic findings because the goal is often to make inferences in a new sample (such as in polygenic risk score analysis).

224,321 British ancestry cases, 147,096 British ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

371417
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.