Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new candidate genes for sickle cell disease nephropathy.

Garrett ME, Soldano KL, Erwin KN et al.

36399516 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1078 Participants
48 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

GM
Garrett ME
SK
Soldano KL
EK
Erwin KN
ZY
Zhang Y
GV
Gordeuk VR
GM
Gladwin MT
TM
Telen MJ
AA
Ashley-Koch AE
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Sickle cell disease nephropathy (SCDN), a common SCD complication, is strongly associated with mortality. Polygenic risk scores calculated from recent transethnic meta-analyses of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trended toward association with proteinuria and eGFR in SCD but the model fit was poor (R2 < 0.01), suggesting that there are likely unique genetic risk factors for SCDN. Therefore, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for 2 critical manifestations of SCDN, proteinuria and decreased eGFR, in 2 well-characterized adult SCD cohorts, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the largest SCDN sample to date. Meta-analysis identified 6 genome-wide significant associations (false discovery rate, q ≤ 0.05): 3 for proteinuria (CRYL1, VWF, and ADAMTS7) and 3 for eGFR (LRP1B, linc02288, and FPGT-TNNI3K/TNNI3K). These associations are independent of APOL1 risk and represent novel SCDN loci, many with evidence for regulatory function. Moreover, GWAS SNPs in CRYL1, VWF, ADAMTS7, and linc02288 are associated with gene expression in kidney and pathways important to both renal function and SCD biology, supporting the hypothesis that SCDN pathophysiology is distinct from other forms of kidney disease. Together, these findings provide new targets for functional follow-up that could be tested prospectively and potentially used to identify patients with SCD who are at risk, before onset of kidney dysfunction.

1,078 individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1078
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
U.S., U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.