Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Longitudinal fundus imaging and its genome-wide association analysis provide evidence for a human retinal aging clock.

Ahadi S, Wilson KA, Babenko B et al.

36975205 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
45444 Participants
66 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

AS
Ahadi S
WK
Wilson KA
BB
Babenko B
MC
McLean CY
BD
Bryant D
PO
Pritchard O
KA
Kumar A
CE
Carrera EM
LR
Lamy R
SJ
Stewart JM
VA
Varadarajan A
BM
Berndl M
KP
Kapahi P
BA
Bashir A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Biological age, distinct from an individual's chronological age, has been studied extensively through predictive aging clocks. However, these clocks have limited accuracy in short time-scales. Here we trained deep learning models on fundus images from the EyePACS dataset to predict individuals' chronological age. Our retinal aging clocking, 'eyeAge', predicted chronological age more accurately than other aging clocks (mean absolute error of 2.86 and 3.30 years on quality-filtered data from EyePACS and UK Biobank, respectively). Additionally, eyeAge was independent of blood marker-based measures of biological age, maintaining an all-cause mortality hazard ratio of 1.026 even when adjusted for phenotypic age. The individual-specific nature of eyeAge was reinforced via multiple GWAS hits in the UK Biobank cohort. The top GWAS locus was further validated via knockdown of the fly homolog, Alk, which slowed age-related decline in vision in flies. This study demonstrates the potential utility of a retinal aging clock for studying aging and age-related diseases and quantitatively measuring aging on very short time-scales, opening avenues for quick and actionable evaluation of gero-protective therapeutics.

45,444 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

45444
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.