Menu
Research Publication

Genomic Evidence Establishes Anatolia as the Source of the European Neolithic Gene Pool

Omrak A, Günther T, Valdiosera C et al.

26748850 PubMed ID
10 Authors
01/25/2016 Published
4 Samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

OA
Omrak A
GT
Günther T
VC
Valdiosera C
SE
Svensson EM
MH
Malmström H
KH
Kiesewetter H
AW
Aylward W
SJ
Storå J
JM
Jakobsson M
GA
Götherström A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Anatolia and the Near East have long been recognized as the epicenter of the Neolithic expansion through archaeological evidence. Recent archaeogenetic studies on Neolithic European human remains have shown that the Neolithic expansion in Europe was driven westward and northward by migration from a supposed Near Eastern origin [1-5]. However, this expansion and the establishment of numerous culture complexes in the Aegean and Balkans did not occur until 8,500 before present (BP), over 2,000 years after the initial settlements in the Neolithic core area [6-9]. We present ancient genome-wide sequence data from 6,700-year-old human remains excavated from a Neolithic context in Kumtepe, located in northwestern Anatolia near the well-known (and younger) site Troy [10]. Kumtepe is one of the settlements that emerged around 7,000 BP, after the initial expansion wave brought Neolithic practices to Europe. We show that this individual displays genetic similarities to the early European Neolithic gene pool and modern-day Sardinians, as well as a genetic affinity to modern-day populations from the Near East and the Caucasus. Furthermore, modern-day Anatolians carry signatures of several admixture events from different populations that have diluted this early Neolithic farmer component, explaining why modern-day Sardinian populations, instead of modern-day Anatolian populations, are genetically more similar to the people that drove the Neolithic expansion into Europe. Anatolia's central geographic location appears to have served as a connecting point, allowing a complex contact network with other areas of the Near East and Europe throughout, and after, the Neolithic.

Chapter III

Ancient DNA Samples

4 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication

4 Samples
Sample ID Date/Era Country Locality Sex mtDNA Y-DNA
kum4 4900 BCE Turkey Kumtepe F
kum6 3773 BCE Turkey Kumtepe F
kum4 4900 BCE Turkey Kumtepe F
kum6 3773 BCE Turkey Kumtepe F
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment