Menu
Research Publication

Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages

Robbeets M, Bouckaert R, Conte M et al.

34759322 PubMed ID
41 Authors
2021 Nov Published
18 Samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

RM
Robbeets M
BR
Bouckaert R
CM
Conte M
SA
Savelyev A
LT
Li T
AD
An DI
SK
Shinoda KI
CY
Cui Y
KT
Kawashima T
KG
Kim G
UJ
Uchiyama J
DJ
Dolińska J
OS
Oskolskaya S
YK
Yamano KY
SN
Seguchi N
TH
Tomita H
TH
Takamiya H
KH
Kanzawa-Kiriyama H
OH
Oota H
IH
Ishida H
KR
Kimura R
ST
Sato T
KJ
Kim JH
DB
Deng B
BR
Bjørn R
RS
Rhee S
AK
Ahn KD
GI
Gruntov I
MO
Mazo O
BJ
Bentley JR
FR
Fernandes R
RP
Roberts P
BI
Bausch IR
GL
Gilaizeau L
YM
Yoneda M
KM
Kugai M
BR
Bianco RA
ZF
Zhang F
HM
Himmel M
HM
Hudson MJ
NC
Ning C
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

The origin and early dispersal of speakers of Transeurasian languages-that is, Japanese, Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic-is among the most disputed issues of Eurasian population history1-3. A key problem is the relationship between linguistic dispersals, agricultural expansions and population movements4,5. Here we address this question by 'triangulating' genetics, archaeology and linguistics in a unified perspective. We report wide-ranging datasets from these disciplines, including a comprehensive Transeurasian agropastoral and basic vocabulary; an archaeological database of 255 Neolithic-Bronze Age sites from Northeast Asia; and a collection of ancient genomes from Korea, the Ryukyu islands and early cereal farmers in Japan, complementing previously published genomes from East Asia. Challenging the traditional 'pastoralist hypothesis'6-8, we show that the common ancestry and primary dispersals of Transeurasian languages can be traced back to the first farmers moving across Northeast Asia from the Early Neolithic onwards, but that this shared heritage has been masked by extensive cultural interaction since the Bronze Age. As well as marking considerable progress in the three individual disciplines, by combining their converging evidence we show that the early spread of Transeurasian speakers was driven by agriculture.

Chapter III

Ancient DNA Samples

18 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication

18 Samples
Sample ID Date/Era Country Locality Sex mtDNA Y-DNA
NAG016 76 BCE Japan Nagabaka F
NAG007 900 BCE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG035 1650 CE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG036 1666 CE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG039 1664 CE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG037 900 BCE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG038 821 BCE Japan Nagabaka F
NAG012 900 BCE Japan Nagabaka M
NAG019 796 BCE Japan Nagabaka F
YAK002 200 BCE Japan Kuma−Nishioda M
AND001 6300 BCE South Korea Ando M
AND004 6300 BCE South Korea Ando F
TYJ001 2500 BCE South Korea Yokchido F
DAJ001 768 BCE South Korea Taejungni M
GDI002 4696 BCE South Korea Changhang F
GDI008 4706 BCE South Korea Changhang M
TYD006 5500 BCE South Korea Yŏndaedo M
TYD007 5500 BCE South Korea Yŏndaedo M
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment