Menu
Currency
Research Publication

Ancient DNA analyses of two Early Chalcolithic Individuals from the West Mound

Dogu, A., Kaptan, D., Yuncu, E. et al.

10 Authors
2024-10-23 Published
898 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

DA
Dogu, A.
KD
Kaptan, D.
YE
Yuncu, E.
GK
Gurun, K.
VK
Vural, K. B.
CM
Chylenski, M.
BJ
Byrnes, J.
GA
Gotherstrom, A.
OF
Ozer, F.
SM
Somel, M.
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

In this chapter, we investigate the genetics of two Early Chalcolithic Catalhoyuk individuals, U.18333 and U.16835, the only two burials yet recovered from the West Mound. These were two neonates buried within the same building. Using shotgun-sequenced partial genomes (0.06x and 0.02x coverage) we identify both as females. Despite being recovered from the same building, we find no close genetic kinship between them, in line with previously published kinship results from Catalhoyuk. We also find that the two West Mound neonates shared the same gene pool with Neolithic Catalhoyuk and other Central and West Anatolian Neolithic populations, and they did not carry the Caucasus-related "eastern" gene flow signature observed in later-coming Chalcolithic Anatolian genomes. This indicates no large-scale admixture between East and West Mound Catalhoyuk, and possibly that the post-Neolithic "eastern" gene flow event into Anatolia may have initiated only by the mid-6th millennium BCE.

Chapter III

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of ancestry and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context