Menu
Research Publication

A genomic Neolithic time transect of hunter-farmer admixture in central Poland

Fernandes DM, Strapagiel D, Borówka P et al.

30291256 PubMed ID
12 Authors
10/05/2018 Published
34 Samples
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

FD
Fernandes DM
SD
Strapagiel D
BP
Borówka P
MB
Marciniak B
ŻE
Żądzińska E
SK
Sirak K
SV
Siska V
GR
Grygiel R
CJ
Carlsson J
MA
Manica A
LW
Lorkiewicz W
PR
Pinhasi R
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Ancient DNA genome-wide analyses of Neolithic individuals from central and southern Europe indicate an overall population turnover pattern in which migrating farmers from Anatolia and the Near East largely replaced autochthonous Mesolithic hunter-gatherers. However, the genetic history of the Neolithic transition in areas lying north of the European Neolithic core region involved different levels of admixture with hunter-gatherers. Here we analyse genome-wide data of 17 individuals spanning from the Middle Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (4300-1900 BCE) in order to assess the Neolithic transition in north-central Poland, and the local impacts of hunter-farmer contacts and Late Neolithic steppe migrations. We evaluate the influence of these on local populations and assess if and how they change through time, reporting evidence of recurrent hunter-farmer admixture over three millennia, and the co-existence of unadmixed hunter-gatherers as late as 4300 BCE. During the Late Neolithic we report the appearance of steppe ancestry, but on a lesser scale than previously described for other central European regions, with evidence of stronger affinities to hunter-gatherers than to steppe pastoralists. These results help understand the Neolithic palaeogenomics of another central European area, Kuyavia, and highlight the complexity of population interactions during those times.

Chapter III

Ancient DNA Samples

34 ancient DNA samples referenced in this publication

34 Samples
Sample ID Date/Era Country Locality Sex mtDNA Y-DNA
N17 2020 BCE Poland Gustorzyn M J1c1b1a R-S24902
N18 3632 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F N1a1a1
N19 3636 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F U5a
N20 3633 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M H3t C-PH428
N22 4442 BCE Poland Brzesc Kujawski F U5a1c
N25 4600 BCE Poland Oslonki F K2a
N26 4335 BCE Poland Konary M T2b30 G-PF3345
N27 4600 BCE Poland Oslonki M V14 G-PF3345
N28 4251 BCE Poland Oslonki M T2b G-PF3345
N31 4327 BCE Poland Oslonki F H26
N36 4600 BCE Poland Konary F J1c5
N38 3307 BCE Poland Brzesc Kujawski F T2c1-a
N42 4233 BCE Poland Oslonki F U5b2a1a
N44 2571 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F U5a1b2
N45 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F H5a8
N47 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M U5b2a2 I-L801
N49 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M H6a1a I-L801
N22 4442 BCE Poland Brzesc Kujawski F U5a1c
N36 4600 BCE Poland Konary F J1c5
N26 4335 BCE Poland Konary M T2b30 G-PF3345
N25 4600 BCE Poland Oslonki F K2a
N27 4600 BCE Poland Oslonki M V14 G-PF3345
N42 4233 BCE Poland Oslonki F U5b2a1a
N31 4327 BCE Poland Oslonki F H26
N28 4251 BCE Poland Oslonki M T2b G-PF3345
N47 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M U5b2a2 I-L801
N45 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F H5a8
N49 2600 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M H6a1a I-L801
N44 2571 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F U5a1b2
N17 2020 BCE Poland Gustorzyn M J1c1b1a R-S24902
N19 3636 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F U5a
N20 3633 BCE Poland Pikutkowo M H3t C-PH428
N18 3632 BCE Poland Pikutkowo F N1a1a1
N38 3307 BCE Poland Brzesc Kujawski F T2c1-a
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of ancestry and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Summary

Key Findings

Ancestry Insights

Traits Analysis

Historical Context

Scientific Assessment