Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects.

Howe LJ, Nivard MG, Morris TT et al.

35534559 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
149174 Participants
157 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

HL
Howe LJ
NM
Nivard MG
MT
Morris TT
HA
Hansen AF
RH
Rasheed H
CY
Cho Y
CG
Chittoor G
AR
Ahlskog R
LP
Lind PA
PT
Palviainen T
VD
van der Zee MD
CR
Cheesman R
MM
Mangino M
WY
Wang Y
LS
Li S
KL
Klaric L
RS
Ratliff SM
BL
Bielak LF
NM
Nygaard M
GA
Giannelis A
WE
Willoughby EA
RC
Reynolds CA
BJ
Balbona JV
AO
Andreassen OA
AH
Ask H
BA
Baras A
BC
Bauer CR
BD
Boomsma DI
CA
Campbell A
CH
Campbell H
CZ
Chen Z
CP
Christofidou P
CE
Corfield E
DC
Dahm CC
DD
Dokuru DR
EL
Evans LM
DG
de Geus EJC
GS
Giddaluru S
GS
Gordon SD
HK
Harden KP
HW
Hill WD
HA
Hughes A
KS
Kerr SM
KY
Kim Y
KH
Kweon H
LA
Latvala A
LD
Lawlor DA
LL
Li L
LK
Lin K
MP
Magnus P
MP
Magnusson PKE
MT
Mallard TT
MP
Martikainen P
MM
Mills MC
NP
Njølstad PR
OJ
Overton JD
PN
Pedersen NL
PD
Porteous DJ
RJ
Reid J
SK
Silventoinen K
SM
Southey MC
SC
Stoltenberg C
TE
Tucker-Drob EM
WM
Wright MJ
HJ
Hewitt JK
KM
Keller MC
SM
Stallings MC
LJ
Lee JJ
CK
Christensen K
KS
Kardia SLR
PP
Peyser PA
SJ
Smith JA
WJ
Wilson JF
HJ
Hopper JL
HS
Hägg S
ST
Spector TD
PJ
Pingault JB
PR
Plomin R
HA
Havdahl A
BM
Bartels M
MN
Martin NG
OS
Oskarsson S
JA
Justice AE
MI
Millwood IY
HK
Hveem K
Naess Ø
WC
Willer CJ
ÅB
Åsvold BO
KP
Koellinger PD
KJ
Kaprio J
MS
Medland SE
WR
Walters RG
BD
Benjamin DJ
TP
Turley P
ED
Evans DM
DS
Davey Smith G
HC
Hayward C
BB
Brumpton B
HG
Hemani G
DN
Davies NM
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Estimates from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of unrelated individuals capture effects of inherited variation (direct effects), demography (population stratification, assortative mating) and relatives (indirect genetic effects). Family-based GWAS designs can control for demographic and indirect genetic effects, but large-scale family datasets have been lacking. We combined data from 178,086 siblings from 19 cohorts to generate population (between-family) and within-sibship (within-family) GWAS estimates for 25 phenotypes. Within-sibship GWAS estimates were smaller than population estimates for height, educational attainment, age at first birth, number of children, cognitive ability, depressive symptoms and smoking. Some differences were observed in downstream SNP heritability, genetic correlations and Mendelian randomization analyses. For example, the within-sibship genetic correlation between educational attainment and body mass index attenuated towards zero. In contrast, analyses of most molecular phenotypes (for example, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol) were generally consistent. We also found within-sibship evidence of polygenic adaptation on taller height. Here, we illustrate the importance of family-based GWAS data for phenotypes influenced by demographic and indirect genetic effects.

upto 71,108 European ancestry sibship

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

149174
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.