Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Genetically adjusted PSA levels for prostate cancer screening.

Kachuri L, Hoffmann TJ, Jiang Y et al.

37264206 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
95768 Participants
43 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

KL
Kachuri L
HT
Hoffmann TJ
JY
Jiang Y
BS
Berndt SI
SJ
Shelley JP
SK
Schaffer KR
MM
Machiela MJ
FN
Freedman ND
HW
Huang WY
LS
Li SA
ER
Easterlin R
GP
Goodman PJ
TC
Till C
TI
Thompson I
LH
Lilja H
VD
Van Den Eeden SK
CS
Chanock SJ
HC
Haiman CA
CD
Conti DV
KR
Klein RJ
MJ
Mosley JD
GR
Graff RE
WJ
Witte JS
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer remains controversial because it increases overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors. Accounting for genetic determinants of constitutive, non-cancer-related PSA variation has potential to improve screening utility. In this study, we discovered 128 genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10-8) in a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of 95,768 men and developed a PSA polygenic score (PGSPSA) that explains 9.61% of constitutive PSA variation. We found that, in men of European ancestry, using PGS-adjusted PSA would avoid up to 31% of negative prostate biopsies but also result in 12% fewer biopsies in patients with prostate cancer, mostly with Gleason score <7 tumors. Genetically adjusted PSA was more predictive of aggressive prostate cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 3.44, P = 6.2 × 10-14, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.755) than unadjusted PSA (OR = 3.31, P = 1.1 × 10-12, AUC = 0.738) in 106 cases and 23,667 controls. Compared to a prostate cancer PGS alone (AUC = 0.712), including genetically adjusted PSA improved detection of aggressive disease (AUC = 0.786, P = 7.2 × 10-4). Our findings highlight the potential utility of incorporating PGS for personalized biomarkers in prostate cancer screening.

85,824 European ancestry individuals, 3,509 African American or Afro-Caribbean individuals, 3,337 East Asian ancestry individuals, 3,098 Hispanic or Latin American individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

95768
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African American or Afro-Caribbean, East Asian, Hispanic or Latin American
Ancestry
U.S., U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.