Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

APOE-ε4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer's disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology.

Talyansky S, Le Guen Y, Kasireddy N et al.

37700353 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
2335 Participants
55 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

TS
Talyansky S
LG
Le Guen Y
KN
Kasireddy N
BM
Belloy ME
GM
Greicius MD
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Lewy body (LB) pathology commonly occurs in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, it remains unclear which genetic risk factors underlie AD pathology, LB pathology, or AD-LB co-pathology. Notably, whether APOE-ε4 affects risk of LB pathology independently from AD pathology is controversial. We adapted criteria from the literature to classify 4,985 subjects from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush University Medical Center as AD-LB co-pathology (AD+LB+), sole AD pathology (AD+LB-), sole LB pathology (AD-LB+), or no pathology (AD-LB-). We performed a meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) per subpopulation (NACC/Rush) for each disease phenotype compared to the control group (AD-LB-), and compared the AD+LB+ to AD+LB- groups. APOE-ε4 was significantly associated with risk of AD+LB- and AD+LB+ compared to AD-LB-. However, APOE-ε4 was not associated with risk of AD-LB+ compared to AD-LB- or risk of AD+LB+ compared to AD+LB-. Associations at the BIN1 locus exhibited qualitatively similar results. These results suggest that APOE-ε4 is a risk factor for AD pathology, but not for LB pathology when decoupled from AD pathology. The same holds for BIN1 risk variants. These findings, in the largest AD-LB neuropathology GWAS to date, distinguish the genetic risk factors for sole and dual AD-LB pathology phenotypes. Our GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics, derived from phenotypes based on postmortem pathologic evaluation, may provide more accurate disease-specific polygenic risk scores compared to GWAS based on clinical diagnoses, which are likely confounded by undetected dual pathology and clinical misdiagnoses of dementia type.

1,072 European ancestry postmortem cases, 1,263 European ancestry postmortem controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

2335
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.