Menu
Currency
Main
Store
Blog

Loading Report

Preparing your ancestry journey

Connecting to ancient matches...

Preparing your report

Skip to main content
Portrait reconstruction of A woman buried in Georgia in the Bronze Age era
Ancient Individual

A woman buried in Georgia in the Bronze Age era

A woman buried in Georgia during the Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia

A fragment of the ancient world, preserved across millennia in strands of DNA.

gur019
1500 BCE - 1000 BCE
Female
Georgia
Scroll to begin
Chapter I

Identity

The biological and cultural markers that define this ancient individual

Sample ID

gur019

Date Range

1500 BCE - 1000 BCE

Cultural Period

Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia

Biological Sex

Female

mtDNA Haplogroup

K1a4b

Y-DNA Haplogroup

N/A (Female)

Chapter II

Place

Where this individual was discovered

Country Georgia
Locality Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain)
Coordinates 41.3100, 46.1700
Chapter III

Time

When this individual lived in the broader context of human history

gur019 1500 BCE - 1000 BCE
Chapter IV

Story

The narrative of this ancient life

The Nazarlebi culture, a fascinating era within the broader timeline of ancient Georgian history, is a relatively lesser-known but pivotal cultural phase that provides valuable insights into the development of early societies in the Caucasus region. To understand the Nazarlebi culture, it’s essential to explore its archaeological, social, and economic aspects, as well as its interactions with neighboring cultures.

Archaeological Background

The Nazarlebi culture dates back to the early Bronze Age, approximately the 4th to the 3rd millennium BCE. It primarily flourished in the geographical area of what is now modern-day Georgia. Archaeological sites associated with the Nazarlebi culture have been discovered in various parts of Georgia, offering a glimpse into the life and advancements of its people. The main sites are located in the fertile river valleys and mountainous regions that provided a diverse environment for settlement and development.

Material Culture

The material culture of the Nazarlebi people is characterized by its unique pottery, metalwork, and architecture. Pottery from this era often displays intricate designs and is typically made from locally sourced clay. These ceramics are not only utilitarian but also hold artistic value, showcasing the early artistic expression of the people.

Metalwork is another significant aspect of the Nazarlebi culture, with evidence of early metallurgy including the crafting of copper and bronze tools and ornaments. This development suggests a society with both skilled artisans and a structured economy capable of supporting metal production.

Architecturally, the Nazarlebi culture exhibited advanced building techniques for the time. Settlements often consisted of well-organized structures, including both residential and communal buildings. The use of stone and wood in construction reflects the resources available and the adaptability of the people to their environment.

Social Structure and Economy

The social structure of the Nazarlebi culture can be inferred from burial practices and settlement organization. Burial sites indicate a society with social stratification. Grave goods, varying in quantity and quality, suggest differences in social status, possibly linked to occupation, wealth, or lineage.

Economically, the Nazarlebi culture was primarily agrarian, with agriculture at the core of its subsistence strategy. The fertile lands of Georgia allowed for the cultivation of various crops, while animal husbandry supplemented the diet and economy. Trade networks likely existed, facilitated by the strategic location of the Caucasus as a bridge between eastern and western civilizations. These connections may have introduced new technologies and ideas, further enriching the culture.

Cultural and Religious Practices

The Nazarlebi people demonstrated a rich tapestry of cultural and possibly religious practices. While specific details are sparse, as with many ancient cultures, artifacts such as figurines and ceremonial objects indicate ritualistic practices that might have been central to their society. The presence of these objects in both domestic and burial contexts suggests a culture with spiritual beliefs, possibly involving ancestor worship or deities linked to natural elements.

Interactions and Influence

The strategic location of the Caucasus region, including modern-day Georgia, meant that the Nazarlebi culture was at the crossroads of various civilizations. This position would have enabled interactions with neighboring cultures such as those in Anatolia, the Iranian plateau, and the Mesopotamian civilizations. Such interactions could lead to the exchange of goods, technologies, and cultural practices, thus influencing the development of the Nazarlebi society.

Legacy

The legacy of the Nazarlebi culture is evident in the subsequent development of Georgian civilization. While much about this culture remains to be discovered, its contributions to metallurgy, social organization, and agrarian practices set the stage for the flourishing of later cultures in the region, including the Colchian and Kura-Araxes cultures. Understanding the Nazarlebi culture provides a vital link in unravelling the complex history of Georgia and the Caucasus, revealing the depth and richness of early human civilization in this part of the world.

Context

Related Samples

This individual exists within a broader network of ancient samples. No ancient genome stands alone.

Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
BOG019 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 100 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG020 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 130 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG024 Turkey Central Bogazkoy-Hattusa Roman Imperial 130 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
BOG028 Modern Turkish (Boğazköy-Hattuša) 1000-1900 CE 1000 CE Boğazköy-Ḫattuša (Çorum, Boğazkale), Turkey View
CTG025 Bronze Age Aegean Culture of Aydin 2015 BCE Çine-Tepecik (Aydın, Çine), Turkey View
G23 Early Bronze Age Theopetra Culture 2343 BCE Theopetra Cave (Thessaly), Greece View
G31 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G37 Early Bronze Age Sarakenos Cave Culture 2476 BCE Boeotia, Sarakenos Cave (Thessalia-Central Greece, Stereas Elladas), Greece View
G62 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G65 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G66 Early Helladic Perachora 2700 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
G76a Early Helladic Perachora 2570 BCE Perachora Cave (Corinthia), Greece View
geo005 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1260 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
geo006 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1043 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
geo015 Kura-Araxes Culture 3017 BCE Doghlauri (Shida Kartli, Kareli), Georgia View
geo017 Doghlauri culture of Georgia 1375 BCE Doghlauri (Shida Kartli, Kareli), Georgia View
geo029 Didnauri Culture of Georgia 1222 BCE Didnauri (Samreklo), Georgia View
Gordion002 Central Anatolian Iron Age Culture (Gordion) 323 BCE Gordion (Central, Ankara), Turkey View
gur016 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur017 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur019 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
mus005 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7457 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
mus006 Central Anatolian Pre-Pottery Neolithic 7311 BCE Musular (Aksaray, Gülağaç), Turkey View
sha003 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha004 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3489 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha006 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha007 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3369 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha008 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha009 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3346 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha010 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
sha012 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
ksha014 Bronze Age Shah Tepe 3200 BCE Shah Tepe (Kerman, Arzuiyeh), Iran View
ulu117 Early Bronze Age Ulucak Culture 4000 BCE Ulucak Höyük (İzmir, Kemalpaşa), Turkey View
zrj003 Shamakhi Culture 205 CE Shamakhi, Azerbaijan View
Sample ID Culture/Period Date Location Action
gur016 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur017 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
gur019 Nazarlebi Culture of Georgia 1500 BCE Nazarlebi (Eastern Georgia, Kakheti, Shiraki Plain), Georgia View
Sources

References

Scientific publications and genetic data that inform this profile.

Scientific Publication

Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in human mobility patterns in Holocene Southwest Asia and the East Mediterranean

Authors Koptekin D, Yüncü E, Rodríguez-Varela R, Altınışık NE, Psonis N et al.
Abstract

We present a spatiotemporal picture of human genetic diversity in Anatolia, Iran, Levant, South Caucasus, and the Aegean, a broad region that experienced the earliest Neolithic transition and the emergence of complex hierarchical societies. Combining 35 new ancient shotgun genomes with 382 ancient and 23 present-day published genomes, we found that genetic diversity within each region steadily increased through the Holocene. We further observed that the inferred sources of gene flow shifted in time. In the first half of the Holocene, Southwest Asian and the East Mediterranean populations homogenized among themselves. Starting with the Bronze Age, however, regional populations diverged from each other, most likely driven by gene flow from external sources, which we term "the expanding mobility model." Interestingly, this increase in inter-regional divergence can be captured by outgroup-f3-based genetic distances, but not by the commonly used FST statistic, due to the sensitivity of FST, but not outgroup-f3, to within-population diversity. Finally, we report a temporal trend of increasing male bias in admixture events through the Holocene.

Use code for 25% off Expires Jul 12