Menu
Currency
GWAS Study

Phenome risk classification enables phenotypic imputation and gene discovery in developmental stuttering.

Shaw DM, Polikowsky HP, Pruett DG et al.

34861174 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
39511 Participants
43 Views
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SD
Shaw DM
PH
Polikowsky HP
PD
Pruett DG
CH
Chen HH
PL
Petty LE
VK
Viljoen KZ
BJ
Beilby JM
JR
Jones RM
KS
Kraft SJ
BJ
Below JE
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Developmental stuttering is a speech disorder characterized by disruption in the forward movement of speech. This disruption includes part-word and single-syllable repetitions, prolongations, and involuntary tension that blocks syllables and words, and the disorder has a life-time prevalence of 6-12%. Within Vanderbilt's electronic health record (EHR)-linked biorepository (BioVU), only 142 individuals out of 92,762 participants (0.15%) are identified with diagnostic ICD9/10 codes, suggesting a large portion of people who stutter do not have a record of diagnosis within the EHR. To identify individuals affected by stuttering within our EHR, we built a PheCode-driven Gini impurity-based classification and regression tree model, PheML, by using comorbidities enriched in individuals affected by stuttering as predicting features and imputing stuttering status as the outcome variable. Applying PheML in BioVU identified 9,239 genotyped affected individuals (a clinical prevalence of ∼10%) for downstream genetic analysis. Ancestry-stratified GWAS of PheML-imputed affected individuals and matched control individuals identified rs12613255, a variant near CYRIA on chromosome 2 (B = 0.323; p value = 1.31 × 10-8) in European-ancestry analysis and rs7837758 (B = 0.518; p value = 5.07 × 10-8), an intronic variant found within the ZMAT4 gene on chromosome 8, in African-ancestry analysis. Polygenic-risk prediction and concordance analysis in an independent clinically ascertained sample of developmental stuttering cases validate our GWAS findings in PheML-imputed affected and control individuals and demonstrate the clinical relevance of our population-based analysis for stuttering risk.

6,339 European ancestry cases, 33,172 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

39511
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African unspecified, East Asian, South Asian, Hispanic or Latin American, Other admixed ancestry, NR
Ancestry
U.S., Republic of Ireland, Australia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

AI-Generated Summary

AI-generated by DNAGENICS

Independent AI summary of health and genetic findings from the published study

Important: This summary is AI-generated by DNAGENICS for informational purposes only. It was not created by, affiliated with, or endorsed by the researchers behind the original publication, and is based solely on that published research. It may contain errors or omissions. DNAGENICS disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies or consequences arising from use of this information. Verify all information against the original publication. This is not professional scientific review or medical advice.

AI Summary In Progress

Our AI-generated summary of this publication is being prepared. Please check back soon.